The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Comparison of Diabetes Education Administered Through Telemedicine Versus in Person
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE—To determine whether diabetes education can be provided as effectively through telemedicine technology as through in-person encounters with diabetes nurse and nutrition educators. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—A total of 56 adults with diabetes were randomized to receive diabetes education in person (control group) or via telemedicine (telemedicine group) and were followed prospectively. The education consisted of three consultative visits with diabetes nurse and nutrition educators. The in-person and telemedicine groups were compared using measures of glycemic control (HbA1c) and questionnaires to assess patient satisfaction and psychosocial functioning as related to diabetes. Outcome measures were obtained at baseline, immediately after the completion of diabetes education, and 3 months after the third educational visit. RESULTS—Patient satisfaction was high in the telemedicine group. Problem Areas in Diabetes scale scores improved significantly with diabetes education (adjusted P < 0.05, before vs. immediately after education and 3 months after education), and the attainment of behavior-change goals did not differ between groups. With diabetes education, HbA1c improved from 8.6 ± 1.8% at baseline to 7.8 ± 1.5% immediately after education and 7.8 ± 1.8% 3 months after the third educational visit (unadjusted P < 0.001, P = 0.089 adjusted for BMI and age), with similar changes observed in the telemedicine and in-person groups. CONCLUSIONS—Diabetes education via telemedicine and in person was equally effective in improving glycemic control, and both methods were well accepted by patients. Reduced diabetes-related stress was observed in both groups. These data suggest that telemedicine can be successfully used to provide diabetes education to patients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Self-Management Education for Adults With Type 2 Diabetes
Norris, S. L., Lau, J., Smith, S. J., Schmid, C. H., & Engelgau, M. M. (2002) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.25.7.1159 · Cited by 1,750
The problem areas in diabetes scale: an evaluation of its clinical utility
Welch, G. W., Jacobson, A. M., & Polonsky, W. H. (1997) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.20.5.760 · Cited by 664 · cited 2×
“At baseline, immediately after the third educational visit (visit 3), and 3 months after the third educational visit, each subject was asked to complete the Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) scale (13), the Diabetes Quality of Life (DQOL) scale (14), and one measure of cognitive appraisal, the Appraisal of Diabetes Sca…”
BackgroundMethod
Cited by
Interactive telemedicine: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes
Flodgren, G., Rachas, A., Farmer, A. J., Inzitari, M., & Shepperd, S. (2015) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd002098.pub2 · Cited by 806
Verhoeven, F., van Gemert-Pijnen, L., Dijkstra, K., Nijland, N., Seydel, E., & Steehouder, M. (2007) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.9.5.e37 · Cited by 252
National Standards for Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support
Haas, L., Maryniuk, M., Beck, J., Cox, C. E., Duker, P., Edwards, L., Fisher, E. B., Hanson, L., Kent, D., Kolb, L., et al. (2014) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc14-s144 · Cited by 264
Asynchronous and synchronous teleconsultation for diabetes care: A systematic literature review
Verhoeven, F., Tanja-Dijkstra, K., Nijland, N., Eysenbach, G., & van Gemert-Pijnen, L. (2010) · Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology · doi:10.1177/193229681000400323 · Cited by 247
Behavioral Programs for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis
Pillay, J., Armstrong, M. J., Butalia, S., Donovan, L. E., Sigal, R. J., Vandermeer, B., Chordiya, P., Dhakal, S., Hartling, L., Nuspl, M., et al. (2015) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/m15-1400 · Cited by 223
Metadata
- Authors
- Izquierdo, R. E., Knudson, P. E., Meyer, S., Kearns, J., Ploutz-Snyder, R., & Weinstock, R. S.
- Venue
- Diabetes Care
- Publisher
- American Diabetes Association
- Published
- 2003-04-01
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1002-1007
- ISSN
- 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-5548
- OpenAlex
- W2110408235
- Cited by
- 201
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Comparison of Diabetes Education Administered Through Telemedicine Versus in Person. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2337/diacare.26.4.1002
- The paper
- Izquierdo, R. E., Knudson, P. E., Meyer, S., Kearns, J., Ploutz-Snyder, R., & Weinstock, R. S. (2003). A Comparison of Diabetes Education Administered Through Telemedicine Versus in Person. Diabetes Care. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.26.4.1002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.