The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Evaluation of a Nurse-Care Management System to Improve Outcomes in Patients With Complicated Diabetes
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE—This study evaluated the efficacy of a nurse-care management system designed to improve outcomes in patients with complicated diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—In this randomized controlled trial that took place at Kaiser Permanente Medical Center in Santa Clara, CA, 169 patients with longstanding diabetes, one or more major medical comorbid conditions, and HbAlc >10% received a special intervention (n = 84) or usual medical care (n = 85) for 1 year. Patients met with a nurse-care manager to establish individual outcome goals, attended group sessions once a week for up to 4 weeks, and received telephone calls to manage medications and self-care activities. HbAlc, LDL, HDL, and total cholesterol, triglycerides, fasting glucose, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, BMI, and psychosocial factors were measured at baseline and 1 year later. Annualized physician visits were determined for the year before and during the study. RESULTS—At 1 year, the mean reductions in HbAlc, total cholesterol, and LDL cholesterol were significantly greater for the intervention group compared with the usual care group. Significantly more patients in the intervention group met the goals for HbA1c (<7.5%) than patients in usual care (42.6 vs. 24.6%, P < 0.03, χ2). There were no significant differences in any of the psychosocial variables or in physician visits. CONCLUSIONS—A nurse-care management program can significantly improve some medical outcomes in patients with complicated diabetes without increasing physician visits.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Chrvala, C. A., Sherr, D., & Lipman, R. D. (2016) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2015.11.003 · Cited by 914
He, X., Li, J., Wang, B., Yao, Q., Li, L., Song, R., Shi, X., & Zhang, J.-A. (2017) · Endocrine · doi:10.1007/s12020-016-1168-2 · Cited by 250
Minet, L., Møller, S., Vach, W., Wagner, L., & Henriksen, J. E. (2010) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2009.09.033 · Cited by 229
What are the effective elements in patient-centered and multimorbidity care? A scoping review
Poitras, M.-E., Maltais, M.-E., Bestard-Denommé, L., Stewart, M., & Fortin, M. (2018) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-018-3213-8 · Cited by 219
Gabbay, R. A., Lendel, I., Saleem, T. M., Shaeffer, G., Adelman, A. M., Mauger, D. T., Collins, M., & Polomano, R. C. (2006) · Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice · doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2005.05.002 · Cited by 107
Metadata
- Authors
- Taylor, C. B., Miller, N. H., Reilly, K. R., Greenwald, G., Cunning, D., Deeter, A., & Abascal, L.
- Venue
- Diabetes Care
- Publisher
- American Diabetes Association
- Published
- 2003-04-01
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1058-1063
- ISSN
- 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-5548
- OpenAlex
- W2005420592
- Cited by
- 179
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation of a Nurse-Care Management System to Improve Outcomes in Patients With Complicated Diabetes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2337/diacare.26.4.1058
- The paper
- Taylor, C. B., Miller, N. H., Reilly, K. R., Greenwald, G., Cunning, D., Deeter, A., & Abascal, L. (2003). Evaluation of a Nurse-Care Management System to Improve Outcomes in Patients With Complicated Diabetes. Diabetes Care. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.26.4.1058
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.