Critical Evaluation of Adult Treatment Panel III Criteria in Identifying Insulin Resistance With Dyslipidemia
Abstract
OBJECTIVE—The goal of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (ATP III) in identifying insulin resistance. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—This study included 74 nondiabetic Caucasians who were evaluated for insulin resistance and risk factors associated with the metabolic syndrome. Glucose disposal rate (GDR) was measured by hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp and was used to quantify insulin resistance. Sensitivity and specificity of ATP III criteria in detecting insulin resistance were calculated for various cutoffs of GDR. RESULTS—Insulin resistance was associated with increased waist circumference, fasting glucose, blood pressure, triglycerides, and decreased levels of HDL cholesterol. Only 12.2% of study subjects met ATP III criteria for metabolic syndrome, and ATP III criteria exhibited low sensitivity for detecting insulin resistance. Although high in specificities (>90%), the sensitivities of ATP III criteria ranged only between 20 and 50% when insulin resistance was defined as various GDR cutoff values below 10 to 12 mg · kg−1 · min−1. The larger number of subjects who were insulin resistant but did not meet ATP III criteria were found to have an adverse cardiovascular disease risk profile, including higher BMI, waist circumference, fasting glucose, triglycerides, and an unfavorable lipoprotein subclass profile determined by nuclear magnetic resonance compared with insulin-sensitive individuals (i.e., increased large VLDL, increased small LDL, and decreased large HDL particle concentrations). CONCLUSIONS—ATP III criteria have low sensitivity for identifying insulin resistance with dyslipidemia in nondiabetic individuals who are at increased risk for cardiovascular disease and diabetes. More sensitive criteria should be developed for clinical assessment of metabolic and cardiovascular disease risk relevant to the metabolic syndrome.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
IFG (fasting glucose 100 to 125 mg/dL) has the greatest predictive power for diabetes compared with other metabolic risk factors.
“Compared with other metabolic risk factors, IFG (fasting glucose 100 to 125 mg/dL) carries the greatest predictive power for diabetes.112”
From Diagnosis and Management of the Metabolic Syndrome: An American Heart Association/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Scientific Statement (2005) · cites this paper as [112]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 27 · Cited by 218
- Authors
- Liao, Y., Kwon, S., Shaughnessy, S., Wallace, P., Hutto, A., Jenkins, A. J., Klein, R. L., & Garvey, W. T.
- Affiliations
- Medical University of South Carolina (US)
- University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- Venue
- Diabetes Care
- Publisher
- American Diabetes Association
- Published
- 2004-04-01
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 978-983
- ISSN
- 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-5548
- OpenAlex
- W2064608611
- Cited by
- 218
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 18.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
- Medical University of South Carolina
- National Institutes of Health (5p01hl055782-10)
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (P01 HL 55782)
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK 38764)
- National Center for Research Resources (M01RR001070)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diet, Metabolism, and Disease
- Keywords
- insulin resistance, NCEP ATP III criteria, metabolic syndrome, dyslipidemia, glucose disposal rate, hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp, sensitivity and specificity, cardiovascular risk, lipoprotein subclasses, non-diabetic adults, waist circumference, triglycerides, HDL cholesterol
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Blood Glucose, Cardiovascular Diseases, Female, Humans, Hyperlipidemias, Insulin Resistance, Lipids, Male, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Sensitivity and Specificity, Glucose Clamp Technique, Body Mass Index, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Metabolic Syndrome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review