Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 175

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Mortality in Diabetic and Nondiabetic Patients After Amputations Performed From 1990 to 1995

Tentolouris, Nicholas, Al-Sabbagh, Sameer, Walker, Michael G., Boulton, Andrew J.M., Jude, Edward B.·2004·Diabetes Care

Abstract

OBJECTIVE—To compare survival rates after first amputation between patients with and without diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AAND METHODS—We performed a retrospective study of all nontraumatic amputations performed at our center in the years 1990–1995 in patients with (n = 100) and without (n = 151) diabetes. Survival status was assessed from the first amputation until 31 December 2001. RESULTS—Altogether, 61% of the patients with and 54.3% of those without diabetes died 5.2 (4.5–5.8) and 5.3 (4.7–5.9) [mean (95% CI)] years after the first amputation, respectively (P = 0.80). Survival was not different between patients with and without diabetes after controlling for the level (major versus minor) (P = 0.67) or the cause (ischemia versus infection) of amputation (P = 0.72). No sex differences were found for survival in either study group. Independent predictors of mortality in the diabetic group were duration of diabetes (P = 0.05), history of stroke (P = 0.02), and serum creatinine level (P < 0.0001), while in the nondiabetic group independent predictors were history of stroke (P = 0.04), serum creatinine level (P = 0.005), and higher white blood cell count (P = 0.02). The peak incidence of amputations was observed in the decade of 67–76 years of age in both groups. Major amputations were more common among nondiabetic patients in all age-groups. Median hospital stay and postoperative complications were comparable between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS—All-cause mortality is high after an amputation in both diabetic and nondiabetic patients. Mortality rates, hospital stay, and postoperative complications are not different between diabetic and nondiabetic amputees. No modifiable factors, with the exception of nephropathy, were found to improve survival in amputees. Peripheral vascular disease and neuropathy are the main cause of amputations; prevention, therefore, of these complications is warranted to prevent amputations and the subsequent high mortality.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/diacare.27.7.1598

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 175

Metadata

Authors
Tentolouris, N., Al-Sabbagh, S., Walker, M. G., Boulton, A. J. M., & Jude, E. B.
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2004-07-01
Volume
27
Issue
7
Pages
1598-1604
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W1990118317
Cited by
175
References
0
FWCI
3.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mortality in Diabetic and Nondiabetic Patients After Amputations Performed From 1990 to 1995. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2337/diacare.27.7.1598
The paper
Tentolouris, N., Al-Sabbagh, S., Walker, M. G., Boulton, A. J. M., & Jude, E. B. (2004). Mortality in Diabetic and Nondiabetic Patients After Amputations Performed From 1990 to 1995. Diabetes Care. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.27.7.1598

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.