CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 125Diabetes Management and EducationWorkplace Health and Well-beingChronic Disease Management Strategies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effects of Depression on Work Loss and Disability Bed Days in Individuals With Diabetes

Egede, Leonard E.·2004·Diabetes Care
DOI 10.2337/diacare.27.7.1751
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Diabetes is highly prevalent in the U.S. and is associated with significant disability and increased health care costs (1–3). Depression is also highly prevalent and is a leading cause of disability, work place absenteeism, diminished or lost productivity, and increased use of health care resources (4,5). Coexisting depression occurs in 10–30% of people with diabetes, and people with diabetes have twofold increased odds of having depression compared with people without diabetes (6,7). The objectives of this study were to determine 1 ) the effect of coexisting depression on mean work loss and disability bed days and 2 ) the effect of coexisting depression on odds of extended (defined as ≥7 days) work loss and disability bed days in individuals with and without diabetes. It was hypothesized that coexisting depression in people with diabetes would be associated with significant increases in mean disability days and odds of extended disability days. Data from the sample adult core of 1999 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) (8) were analyzed. The NHIS is a nationally representative household survey of U.S. adults aged ≥18 years. The sample is selected by a complex sampling design involving stratification, clustering, and multistage sampling, with a nonzero probability of selection for each person. Final weights allow estimates from the NHIS to be generalized to the adult civilian population of the U.S. (9). Work loss …

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/diacare.27.7.1751

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 125

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Egede, L. E.
Affiliations
Medical University of South Carolina (US)
Corresponding author
Egede, Leonard E.
ORCID
Egede, Leonard E.
Venue
Diabetes Care
Publisher
American Diabetes Association
Published
2004-07-01
Volume
27
Issue
7
Pages
1751-1753
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
DOI
10.2337/diacare.27.7.1751
OpenAlex
W2115358128
Cited by
125
References
8
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 10
FWCI
2.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • American Diabetes Association
  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (5K08HS11418)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
Keywords
depression, diabetes mellitus, work loss, absenteeism, comorbidities, disability duration, productivity loss, National Health Interview Survey
MeSH terms
Absenteeism, Adult, Bed Rest, Depression, Diabetes Mellitus, Disabled Persons, Persons with Disabilities, Health Surveys, Humans, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review