Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 8,673

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes

Power, David·2006·Diabetes Care

Abstract

I write in reference to the recently updated and circulated “Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes,” in particular part II, “Screening for Diabetes,” which were recently updated and published in the American Diabetes Association (ADA) 2006 Clinical Practice Recommendations (1). I would like to take issue with the use of the phrase “standards of medical care in diabetes,” which is used to …

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/diacare.29.02.06.dc05-1593

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. American Diabetes Association: Standards of medical care in diabetes–2006 (Position Statement). Diabetes Care (Suppl. 1):S4–S42, 2006 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 8,673

Metadata

Authors
Power, D.
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2006-02-01
Volume
29
Issue
2
Pages
476-476
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W2059158127
Cited by
8,673
References
0
FWCI
285.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2337/diacare.29.02.06.dc05-1593
The paper
Power, D. (2006). Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes. Diabetes Care. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.29.02.06.dc05-1593

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.