Cited by 27Diabetes Management and ResearchPancreatic function and diabetesDiabetes Treatment and Management

The Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT): Effect of Rate of Ingestion of Carbohydrate and Different Carbohydrate Preparations

Heine, Robert J, Hanning, Ian, Morgan, Linda, Alberti, K George M M·1983·Diabetes Care

Abstract

The glucose load of the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) is well standardized. However, recommendations on rate of ingestion and nature of the load are vague. In this study the effect on blood glucose, serum insulin, C-peptide, and plasma gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) of giving 75 g glucose in 300 ml over 1 and 10 min (G1 and G10) was investigated in six subjects. In five an isocaloric amount of partially hydrolyzed starch (Hycal) was also used (H1 and H10). The fast glucose intake, compared with the slow ingestion, resulted in an earlier rise in blood glucose levels, accompanied by a faster serum insulin and C-peptide response. Between 90 and 135 min blood glucose concentrations were significantly higher after the 10-min glucose intake. At 120 min blood glucose levels were 5.5 +/- 0.5 and 4.7 +/- 0.5 mmol/L, respectively, for G10 and G1 (P less than 0.05). In the first half hour after slow and fast Hycal intake no differences were seen in blood glucose, serum insulin, and C-peptide levels. Between 45 and 120 min blood glucose levels were significantly higher after the 10-min Hycal intake. At 120 min blood glucose levels were 5.3 +/- 0.2 and 4.4 +/- 0.1 mmol/L, respectively, for H10 and H1 (P less than 0.01). Except for a faster rise in glucose and insulin levels after glucose loading in 1 min, no further differences were found, when compared with Hycal. No significant differences were seen in the GIP responses. Thus differences in rates of ingestion can cause signif…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/diacare.6.5.441

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Consuming 75 g glucose solution over 10 min as compared with 1 min tended to increase blood glucose 60 to 120 min later, possibly because of a significantly smaller insulin response during the first 30 min.

    “Consuming 75 g glucose solution over 10 min as compared with 1 min tended to increase blood glucose 60 to 120 min later, possibly because of a significantly smaller insulin response during the first 30 min (Heine et al. 1983).”

    From Glycaemic index methodology (2005) · cites this paper as Heine et al. 1983

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heine, R. J., Hanning, I., Morgan, L., & Alberti, K. G. M. M.
Affiliations
  • Royal Victoria Infirmary (GB)
  • University of Surrey (GB)
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
1983-09-01
Volume
6
Issue
5
Pages
441-445
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W2055199918
Cited by
27
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
1.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
Keywords
oral glucose tolerance test, glucose load, blood glucose, serum insulin, C-peptide, glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide, test standardization
MeSH terms
Adult, Blood Glucose, C-Peptide, Dietary Carbohydrates, Female, Gastric Inhibitory Polypeptide, Glucose, Glucose Tolerance Test, Humans, Insulin, Male, Starch, Time Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review