Commentary: Why Was Inhaled Insulin a Failure in the Market?
Open accessAbstract
Just a few years shy of a century ago, a group of Canadian researchers discovered a viable method of extracting insulin, filling a large and critical gap in the therapeutic treatment of diabetes (1). Since then, insulin and its associated delivery devices have become an integral part of the care and management of patients living with diabetes. Shortly after the first insulin injection was successfully delivered, vials of insulin became available commercially. At this time, large glass syringes were used to administer insulin, and each injection required sterilization of the syringe, as well as sharpening of the syringe needle with a pumice stone. Through the years, insulin syringes modernized, but it was not until the 1970s that an alternate delivery system—the insulin pump, used in continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) regimens—became available. Fifteen years later, the first insulin pen was introduced to the marketplace, providing evidence that, as time progresses, there is no shortage of innovation in the diabetes arena. The first two rapid-acting inhaled insulins on the market—Exubera in 2006 and Afrezza in 2014—represented yet another innovation milestone. In theory, inhaled insulin completely eliminated the psychological barriers associated with subcutaneous insulin delivery, such as needle phobia and incorrect injection technique. However, in October 2007, Pfizer withdrew Exubera from the market, and in January 2016, Sanofi withdrew from a $925 million marketing agreement with MannKind for Afrezza; both removals were due to poor sales volume. Although patients and providers have been searching for years for alternatives to injecting insulin, Exubera has already failed, and Afrezza’s destiny is uncertain. In 2006, Exubera was the first inhaled insulin approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). It showed noninferiority in efficacy with regard to A1C lowering in both type 1 diabetes (2) and type 2 diabetes (3) compared to mixed regular/NPH …
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Inhaled insulin has a faster onset of action and offset of effect than any of the injected insulins.
“Advances in insulin delivery have also included the development of inhaled insulin with a faster onset of action and offset of effect than any of the injected insulins121.”
From 100 years of insulin: celebrating the past, present and future of diabetes therapy (2021) · cites this paper as [121]
The opening section calls Exubera and Afrezza rapid-acting inhaled insulins, and “Emerging Safety Concerns” describes Afrezza’s rapid offset (page unavailable in our copy). The paper does not establish that inhaled insulin has a faster onset and offset than every injected insulin. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Drucker, D. J., Buse, J. B., Taylor, K., Kendall, D. M., Trautmann, M., Zhuang, D., & Porter, L. (2008) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(08)61206-4 · Cited by 1,070 · see citing works
Rosenstock, J., Franco, D., Korpachev, V., Shumel, B., Ma, Y., Baughman, R., Amin, N., McGill, J. B., & for the Affinity 2 Study Group (2015) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc15-0629 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 16
- [1]Rosenfeld L Insulin: discovery and controversy. Clin Chem 2002; 48: 2270– 2288 12446492
- [2]Quattrin T, Belanger A, Bohannon NJV, Efficacy and safety of inhaled insulin (Exubera) compared with subcutaneous insulin therapy in patients with type 1 diabetes: results of a 6-month, randomized, comparative trial. Diabetes Care 2004; 27: 2622– 2627 15504996
- [3]Hollander PA, Blonde L, Rowe R, Efficacy and safety of inhaled insulin (Exubera) compared with subcutaneous insulin therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes: results of a 6-month, randomized, comparative trial. Diabetes Care 2004; 27: 2356– 2362 15451900
- [6]Bode BW, McGill JB, Lorber DL, Inhaled Technosphere insulin compared with injected prandial insulin in type 1 diabetes: a randomized 24-week trial. Diabetes Care 2015; 38: 2266– 2273 26180109
- [12]Blanco M, Hernandez MT, Strauss KW, Prevalence and risk factors of lipohypertrophy in insulin-injecting patients with diabetes. Diabetes Metab 2013; 39: 445– 453 23886784
- [13]Vardar B, Kizilci S Incidence of lipohypertrophy in diabetic patients and a study of influencing factors. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2007; 77: 231– 236 17303282
- [14]Omar MA, El-Kafoury AA, El-Araby RI Lipohypertrophy in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes and the associated factors. BMC Res Notes 2011; 4: 290 21838879 PMC3186759
- [15]Raskin P, Heller S, Honka M, Pulmonary function over 2 years in diabetic patients treated with prandial inhaled Technosphere insulin or usual antidiabetes treatment: a randomized trial. Diabetes Obes Metab 2012; 14: 163– 173 21951325
- [16]DCCT Research Group The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 977– 986 8366922
- [19]Kruger DF, LaRue S, Estepa P Recognition of and steps to mitigate anxiety and fear of pain in injectable diabetes treatment. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes 2015; 8: 49– 56 25653546 PMC4303400
- [20]Huang ES, Basu A, O’Grady M, Projecting the future diabetes population size and related costs for the U.S. Diabetes Care 2009; 32: 2225– 2229 19940225 PMC2782981
- [21]Chou DH, Webber MJ, Tang BC, Glucose-responsive insulin activity by covalent modification with aliphatic phenylboronic acid conjugates. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2015; 112: 2401– 2406 25675515 PMC4345600
- [22]Traverso G, Schoellhammer CM, Schroeder A, Microneedles for drug delivery via the gastrointestinal tract. J Pharm Sci 2015; 104: 362– 367 25250829 PMC4349565
- [23]Aronson R, Ohad C, Ignacio C, OpT2mise: a randomized controlled trial to compare insulin pump therapy with multiple daily injections in the treatment of type 2 diabetes: research design and methods. Diabetes Technol Ther 2014; 16: 414– 420 24735134
- [24]Pozzilli P CSII and other technologies for preventing beta cell failure in type 2 diabetes [Abstract]. Diabetes Technol Ther 2016; 18: A126836419
- [25]Heinemann L, Hirsch L, Hovorka R Lipohypertrophy and the artificial pancreas: is this an issue? J Diabetes Sci Technol 2014; 8: 915– 917 25172874 PMC4455381
Cited by
Sorted by citations
100 years of insulin: celebrating the past, present and future of diabetes therapy
Sims, E. K., Carr, A. L. J., Oram, R. A., DiMeglio, L. A., & Evans-Molina, C. (2021) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-021-01418-2 · Cited by 270 · see citing works
Treatment strategies against diabetes: Success so far and challenges ahead.
Khursheed, R., Singh, S. K., Wadhwa, S., Kapoor, B., Gulati, M., Kumar, R., Ramanunny, A. K., Awasthi, A., & Dua, K. (2019) · European Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.ejphar.2019.172625 · Cited by 239 · see citing works
- Authors
- Oleck, J., Kassam, S., & Goldman, J. D.
- Affiliations
- Becton Dickinson (United States) (US)
- Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences (US)
- Corresponding author
- Goldman, Jennifer D.
- ORCID
- Goldman, Jennifer D.
- Venue
- Diabetes Spectrum
- Publisher
- American Diabetes Association
- Published
- 2016-08-01
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 180-184
- ISSN
- 1040-9165 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-7353
- PMC
- PMC5001220
- OpenAlex
- W2511408899
- Cited by
- 84
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Diabetes Spectrum (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
- Keywords
- inhaled insulin, Exubera, Afrezza, drug sales, type 1 diabetes, type 2 diabetes, insulin delivery devices, insulin pump, insulin pens, needle phobia
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review