Cited by 89Stroke Rehabilitation and RecoverySpatial Neglect and Hemispheric DysfunctionDysphagia Assessment and Management

Arm use in patients with subacute stroke monitored by accelerometry: Association with motor impairment and influence on self-dependence

Open access
Thrane, G, Emaus, N, Askim, T, Anke, A·2011·Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of arm motor impairment on actual arm use in the early post-stroke period and explore its association with self-care dependency. SUBJECTS: Thirty-one patients recruited within the 30 first days after stroke. METHODS: Motor impairment of the upper extremity was measured with Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment (FMA) and arm use was measured with accelerometry. Arm movement ratio (AMR), the ratio of arm use duration between the more and less affected arm, was calculated. Self-care dependency was defined as needing personal assistance in primary self-care activities. RESULTS: FMA of the more affected arm was strongly associated with AMR (Spearman's correlation coefficient -0.851, p>0.001), although some patients deviated considerably from the regression line. Covariates did not have any influence on this relation. Both arm motor function and actual arm use related to self-care dependency, but were no longer significant when we controlled for lower extremity motor function. CONCLUSION: FMA and AMR correlated highly in the early post-stroke period. These measures relate to different dimensions of the International Classification of Functioning and Health, and could be supplementary measures to reveal non-use of the affected arm. Arm use and arm impairment were not significantly associated with self-care dependency in our sample.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2340/16501977-0676

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 31 · Cited by 89

Authors
Thrane, G., Emaus, N., Askim, T., & Anke, A.
Affiliations
  • UiT The Arctic University of Norway (NO)
  • University Hospital of North Norway (NO)
  • Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
Venue
Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine
Published
2011
Volume
43
Issue
4
Pages
299-304
ISSN
1650-1977 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2132133201
Cited by
89
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
4.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BIBSYS Brage (BIBSYS (Norway)) (submittedVersion)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Dysphagia Assessment and Management
Keywords
subacute stroke, arm use, upper limb motor impairment, accelerometry, Fugl-Meyer Assessment, early post-stroke period
MeSH terms
Acceleration, Stroke Rehabilitation, Activities of Daily Living, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Arm, Cross-Sectional Studies, Disability Evaluation, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Motor Activity, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Stroke

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review