Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 431

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 69 of the 69 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Keys to Clinical Success with Pulp Capping: A Review of the Literature

Open access
Hilton, T. J.·2009·Operative Dentistry
DOI 10.2341/09-132-0
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Clinical Relevance. Confusion and misconceptions surround direct and indirect pulp capping. This review of the literature provides evidence-based recommendations to guide clinicians in their decision-making process when they encounter a situation requiring pulp capping.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2341/09-132-0

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 69 references

Cited by

See all 431

Metadata

Authors
Hilton, T. J.
Venue
Operative Dentistry
Publisher
Operative Dentistry
Published
2009-09
Volume
34
Issue
5
Pages
615-625
ISSN
  • 0361-7734 (ISSN-L)
  • 1559-2863
DOI
10.2341/09-132-0
OpenAlex
W2153964181
Cited by
431
References
69
FWCI
5.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Keys to Clinical Success with Pulp Capping: A Review of the Literature. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2341/09-132-0
The paper
Hilton, T. J. (2009). Keys to Clinical Success with Pulp Capping: A Review of the Literature. Operative Dentistry. https://doi.org/10.2341/09-132-0

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.