Cited by 48Animal testing and alternativesAnimal Behavior and Welfare StudiesVeterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia

Environmental enrichment may alter the number of rats needed to achieve statistical significance

Open access
Eskola, Satu, Lauhikari, Marja, Voipio, Hanna-Marja, Laitinen, Matti, Nevalainen, Timo·2019·Scandinavian Journal of Laboratory Animal Sciences

Abstract

Currently, environmental enrichment studies have focused on detection of differences in group means resulting from varied enrichments. The effects of enrichment procedures on variation and hence on study results have received far less attention. Within group variation in studies is directly related to adequate sample size and thus determines ethically correct number of animals to be used. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of enrichment items on clinical chemistry and physiological parameters of Wistar rats with the emphasis on the extent of variation. Fortyeight weaned female and male outbred Wistar rats from eight different litters were housed for five weeks in groups of four rats per cage with an aspen tube (20x12x12 em), an aspen block (6x6x6 cm) or without enrichment items (control animals). At the end of the study, adrenals and brown adipose tissues were weighed, growth calculated from initial and final body weights and the following assays were performed from serum samples: AFOS, ALAT, ASAT, LDH, GGT, Pi, Ca, cholesterol, triglycerides, ereatinine, total bilirubin, protein and corticosterone. Based on the variation detected, SOLO Power Analysis was used to calculate the smallest number of animals required (n) to detect an arbitrarily chosen 20 % difference in all means, when significance was set at p=0.05 and statistical power at 0.90. Based on the n-values, additional N-ratio (nenrichment / ncontrol) was calculated to indicate, how many times more or less animals were needed in the enrichment group in comparison to the control group. The enrichment items did not have effects on group means. However. they seemed to influence the variation and hence on the number of animals needed, with enzyme parameters being the most sensitive in this respect. This relationship between enrichment, variation and number of animals needed should be kept in mind while designing experiments with ethically correct sample size.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.23675/sjlas.v26i3.845

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eskola, S., Lauhikari, M., Voipio, H.-M., Laitinen, M., & Nevalainen, T.
Venue
Scandinavian Journal of Laboratory Animal Sciences
Publisher
Scandinavian Journal of Laboratory Animal Sciences
Published
2019-10-11
ISSN
0901-3393 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2787518195
Cited by
48
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scandinavian journal of laboratory animal science (publishedVersion)
  • Ajakirjad. Journals by UT
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal testing and alternatives
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia
Keywords
environmental enrichment, sample size, statistical power, within-group variation, Wistar rats, clinical chemistry, corticosterone, brown adipose tissue, adrenal gland, animal welfare in research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review