Cited by 6Scoliosis diagnosis and treatmentErgonomics and Musculoskeletal DisordersLower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The geometric curvature of the lumbar spine during restricted and unrestricted squats

Hebling Campos, Mário, Furtado Alaman, Laizi I., Seffrin-Neto, Aldo A., Vieira, Carlos A., Costa De Paula, Marcelo, Barbosa de Lira, Claudio A.·2017·The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness

Abstract

Background The main purpose of this study was to analyze the behavior of the geometric curvature of the lumbar spine during restricted and unrestricted squats, using a novel investigative method. The rationale for our hypothesis is that the lumbar curvature has different patterns at different spine levels depending on the squat technique used. Methods Spine motion was collected via stereo-photogrammetric analysis in nineteen participants (11 males, 8 females). The reconstructed spine points at the upright neutral position and at the deepest position of the squat exercise were projected onto the sagittal plane of the trunk, a polynomial was fitted to the data, and were quantified the two-dimensional geometric curvature at lower, central and higher lumbar levels, besides the inclination of trunk and lumbosacral region, the overall geometric curvature and overall angle of the lumbar spine. The mean values for each variable were analysed with paired t-test (P Results The lumbar presents a flexion from upright neutral posture to deepest point of the movement, but for the lower lumbar the flexion is less intense if the knees travel anteriorly past the toes. The trunk and the lumbosacral region lean forward in both squat techniques and these effects are also reduced in unrestricted squats. Conclusions The data collected in the study are evidence that during barbell squats the lumbar curvature has different patterns at different spinal levels depending on the exercise technique. The…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.23736/s0022-4707.16.06184-3

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hebling Campos, M., Furtado Alaman, L. I., Seffrin-Neto, A. A., Vieira, C. A., Costa De Paula, M., & Barbosa de Lira, C. A.
Affiliations
Universidade Federal de Goiás (BR)
Venue
The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness
Published
2017-05
Volume
57
Issue
6
Pages
773-781
ISSN
  • 0022-4707 (ISSN-L)
  • 1827-1928
OpenAlex
W2467984249
Cited by
6
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
Keywords
lumbar curvature, squatting, barbell squat, squat technique, lumbar flexion, trunk inclination, lumbosacral region, spinal loading
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Biomechanical Phenomena, Female, Humans, Lumbar Vertebrae, Male, Posture, Range of Motion, Articular, Resistance Training, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review