Effectiveness of a nutraceutical supplement containing highly standardized perilla and ginger extracts in patients with functional dyspepsia
Abstract
Background In Western countries functional dyspepsia (FD) has a prevalence of 10-20% among adults and although many drugs are currently available for use within clinical practice, FD remains an important challenge for physicians. Recently, food supplements that are ginger-based, along with other botanicals, have been proposed to be a possible natural alternative to pharmaceutical drugs to empirically counteract the symptoms of FD. Methods We have therefore retrospectively analyzed the efficacy and safety profiles of a nutraceutical containing, in addition to a highly standardized ginger root extract, a multi-fractionated botanical obtained from Perilla frutescens leaf containing an innovative bouquet of compounds, including hydrophilic polyphenols and the lipophilic terpenoid perilla ketone. Results The results of our single-group study, obtained from patients with a diagnosis of FD who were treated with the perilla/ginger nutraceutical, demonstrated a good efficacy profile, with a significant reduction observed in nearly all evaluated symptoms (epigastric pain, heartburn, gastric reflux, nausea, borborygmi, early satiety, diarrhea/constipation) starting from the first week of treatment that was further improved after 2 weeks. The treatment was well tolerated with very mild side effects (flatulence, meteorism, gastric burning, difficulty in falling asleep) lasting 3-4 days, which disappeared without stopping the treatment. Conclusions Despite all the limitations of our pragma…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Several trials reported positive effects of ginger on at least one dyspepsia symptom, such as nausea, bloating, and abdominal pain.
“several trials reported positive effects of ginger on at least one dyspepsia symptom, such as nausea, bloating, and abdominal pain [14, 37, 41, 42].”
Long-term studies (i.e., 2-4 weeks) found significant beneficial effects of ginger on dyspepsia symptoms.
“Long-term studies (i.e., 2–4 weeks) found significant beneficial effects of ginger on dyspepsia symptoms [14, 37, 41, 42]”
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 26 · Cited by 7
- Authors
- Di Pierro, F., Giovannone, M., Saponara, M., & Ivaldi, L.
- Venue
- Minerva Gastroenterologica e Dietologica
- Publisher
- Edizioni Minerva Medica
- Published
- 2020-04
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 35-40
- ISSN
- 1121-421X (ISSN-L)
- 1827-1642
- OpenAlex
- W3016283887
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 1.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Minerva Gastroenterologica e Dietologica (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Ginger and Zingiberaceae research
- Keywords
- functional dyspepsia, nutraceuticals, Perilla frutescens, ginger extract, standardized herbal extract, polyphenols, terpenoids, symptom relief, treatment safety, empirical treatment
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Dyspepsia, Female, Humans, Male, Phytotherapy, Middle Aged, Plant Extracts, Retrospective Studies, Treatment Outcome, Dietary Supplements, Zingiber officinale, Perilla, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review