Cited by 7Gastrointestinal motility and disordersComplementary and Alternative Medicine StudiesGinger and Zingiberaceae research

Effectiveness of a nutraceutical supplement containing highly standardized perilla and ginger extracts in patients with functional dyspepsia

Di Pierro, Francesco, Giovannone, Maurizio, Saponara, Mariella, Ivaldi, Leandro·2020·Minerva Gastroenterologica e Dietologica

Abstract

Background In Western countries functional dyspepsia (FD) has a prevalence of 10-20% among adults and although many drugs are currently available for use within clinical practice, FD remains an important challenge for physicians. Recently, food supplements that are ginger-based, along with other botanicals, have been proposed to be a possible natural alternative to pharmaceutical drugs to empirically counteract the symptoms of FD. Methods We have therefore retrospectively analyzed the efficacy and safety profiles of a nutraceutical containing, in addition to a highly standardized ginger root extract, a multi-fractionated botanical obtained from Perilla frutescens leaf containing an innovative bouquet of compounds, including hydrophilic polyphenols and the lipophilic terpenoid perilla ketone. Results The results of our single-group study, obtained from patients with a diagnosis of FD who were treated with the perilla/ginger nutraceutical, demonstrated a good efficacy profile, with a significant reduction observed in nearly all evaluated symptoms (epigastric pain, heartburn, gastric reflux, nausea, borborygmi, early satiety, diarrhea/constipation) starting from the first week of treatment that was further improved after 2 weeks. The treatment was well tolerated with very mild side effects (flatulence, meteorism, gastric burning, difficulty in falling asleep) lasting 3-4 days, which disappeared without stopping the treatment. Conclusions Despite all the limitations of our pragma…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.23736/s1121-421x.19.02650-3

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 26 · Cited by 7

Authors
Di Pierro, F., Giovannone, M., Saponara, M., & Ivaldi, L.
Venue
Minerva Gastroenterologica e Dietologica
Published
2020-04
Volume
66
Issue
1
Pages
35-40
ISSN
  • 1121-421X (ISSN-L)
  • 1827-1642
OpenAlex
W3016283887
Cited by
7
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Minerva Gastroenterologica e Dietologica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Ginger and Zingiberaceae research
Keywords
functional dyspepsia, nutraceuticals, Perilla frutescens, ginger extract, standardized herbal extract, polyphenols, terpenoids, symptom relief, treatment safety, empirical treatment
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Dyspepsia, Female, Humans, Male, Phytotherapy, Middle Aged, Plant Extracts, Retrospective Studies, Treatment Outcome, Dietary Supplements, Zingiber officinale, Perilla, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review