The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Covid-19 and (re)learning teaching: Never let a crisis go to waste
Open accessAbstract
For universities around the world, the Covid-19 pandemic necessitated a rapid transition to online (remote, distance) education as authorities implemented measures to reduce infection rates. In Sweden, universities witnessed roughly 18 months of continuous online education, followed by a period of mixed and campus-based learning environments in the autumn of 2021, and a return to online education in early 2022 as infection rates increased. The Swedish government’s removal of restrictions and plans to remove Covid-19’s classification as a disease dangerous to society (samhällsfarlig sjukdom), however, suggest that universities will no longer be required to offer online instruction. In response to this shift, and in the spirit of Winston Churchill’s call to “never let a good crisis go to waste,” we investigate some changes in teaching and learning caused by the Covid transition. Findings in international studies about university adaptations to Covid and quantitative and qualitative data from our home institution indicate that distance education catalysed new technological engagements for students and teachers, while also reinforcing pedagogical and didactical developments discussed in the literature on teaching and learning in higher education. In other words, the Covid crisis encouraged instructors to (re)learn to teach – not merely by adopting new technologies, but also by implementing student-centred learning. To illustrate this claim, we examine key changes made by teachers in our department, which include pre-recorded minilectures, student-response technologies, and other practices loosely classifiable as interactive learning. These adaptations could facilitate teaching and learning on campus, should teachers choose to continue using them.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Key aspects of our study location's learning culture include that lectures are the most common form of instruction, with seminars and group projects occurring less frequently (Wackenhut & Gillette, 2022, pp. 55-56).”
From Toward Partnership Ethics for Generative Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education (2026) · cites this paper as Wackenhut & Gillette, 2022
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
What the Student Does: teaching for enhanced learning
Biggs, J. (1999) · Higher Education Research & Development · doi:10.1080/0729436990180105 · Cited by 1,332
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Toward Partnership Ethics for Generative Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education
Gillette, M., Wackenhut, A., & Olsson, E. (2026) · Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice · doi:10.53761/yf2gt848 · Cited by 1
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Wackenhut, A. F., & Gillette, M. B.
- Affiliations
- University of Gothenburg (SE)
- Venue
- Högre utbildning
- Published
- 2022-06-08
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 2000-7558 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4285260630
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 3
- FWCI
- 2.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Högre utbildning (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Göteborgs Universitet
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Education during COVID-19 pandemic
- Social Sciences › Education › E-Learning and COVID-19
- Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
- Keywords
- COVID-19 pandemic, online learning, distance education, university teaching, pedagogical adaptation, student-centered learning, interactive learning, higher education, Sweden
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review