Cited by 0Acute Myocardial Infarction ResearchChronic Kidney Disease and DiabetesGenetic Associations and Epidemiology

Kidney function-dependent plasma proteomic architecture of incident myocardial infarction: a proteome-wide association study of UK Biobank participants

Open access
Lee, Yongwoo, Ham, Young Rok, Na, Ki Ryang, Choi, Dae Eun·2026·Kidney Research and Clinical Practice

Abstract

Background: Individuals across the spectrum of kidney function experience excess risk of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), but whether the plasma proteome's association with this risk is itself modified by the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) remains uncharacterized. Methods: Cox proteome-wide association studies of 2,923 Olink proteins in 33,446 UK Biobank participants (fully adjusted model 2: 29,417 complete cases, 1,584 incident AMI events; the full eligible cohort comprised 1,848 events, the complete-case reduction reflecting full covariate adjustment). After fully adjusted screening, protein × eGFR interaction models tested whether each protein association was modified by eGFR (continuous). Incremental prediction was evaluated with a leakage-free elastic-net Cox model. Results: Over a median 13.9-year follow-up, 1,848 AMI events occurred. After multivariable adjustment, 975 proteins were linked to AMI (false discovery rate [FDR]-adjusted p < 0.05). For 176 of these, the AMI association was modified by kidney function (interaction FDR < 0.05)-strengthening as eGFR declined for 154 proteins and at higher eGFR for a smaller set of 22. Exploratory GSEA identified FDR-significant innate immune enrichment in the higher-eGFR direction, whereas lower-eGFR cardiac and matrix signals were nominal. Adding plasma proteins to clinical predictors modestly improved 10-year AMI prediction (Harrell C, 0.748 → 0.780; ΔC = 0.032, 95% confidence interval = 0.021-0.043). Conclusion: Kidney function modifies the plasma proteomic signature of incident AMI: most protein-AMI associations intensify as eGFR declines, while a smaller subset strengthens at preserved filtration. This supports kidney function-aware proteomic cardiovascular risk interpretation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.23876/j.krcp.26.191

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Authors
Lee, Y., Ham, Y. R., Na, K. R., & Choi, D. E.
Affiliations
Chungnam National University (KR)
Venue
Kidney Research and Clinical Practice
Published
2026-10-06
ISSN
  • 2211-9132 (ISSN-L)
  • 2211-9140
OpenAlex
W7220652446
Cited by
0
References
0
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Kidney Research and Clinical Practice (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Keywords
myocardial infarction, plasma proteome, estimated glomerular filtration rate, renal function, cardiovascular risk prediction, UK Biobank

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review