VirtuMath: The Needs of Assistive Technology in Mathematics Learning for Students with Deaf-Mute Disabilities
Open accessAbstract
Students with deaf-mute disabilities in inclusive elementary schools often face significant barriers in accessing verbal instruction, particularly in subjects that require abstract reasoning such as mathematics. This study aims to explore the difficulties in learning mathematics experienced by students with deaf-mute disabilities in inclusive elementary schools and analyze the need for the use of assistive technology to support their learning. This study uses a descriptive qualitative approach with data collection techniques in the form of in-depth interviews and classroom observations. The research participants consisted of one teacher, two hearing impairment students, two parents, and one principal. Data analysis was carried out using the data triangulation method. The results of the study indicate that students with deaf-mute disabilities have difficulty in understanding mathematical concepts that are delivered verbally, especially in abstract terminology. The findings also reveal that visual and interactive assistive technology is needed to help students understand mathematics material better. Teachers, parents, and students expect technology that combines animation, video, interactive images, and physical devices that support direct interaction with learning materials. Based on these findings, VirtuMath, as an assistive technology that integrates visual and sensory representations, is proposed as a potential solution to support mathematics learning for hearing impairment…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Technology-supported media can strengthen civic learning because students can access contextual, visual, and interactive representations of values that are often difficult to internalize through conventional explanation alone.
“Technology-supported media can also strengthen civic learning because students can access contextual, visual, and interactive representations of values that are often difficult to internalize through conventional explanation alone (Antara et al., 2025;Suarjana et al., 2025).”
From Problem-Based Educational Games for Pancasila Education: Enhancing Elementary Students’ Learning Outcomes through Interactive Digital Media (2026) · cites this paper as Suarjana et al., 2025
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Aprima, Agustini, K., & Sudatha, I. G. W. (2026) · Journal of Education Technology · doi:10.23887/jet.v10i01.65702
- Authors
- Suarjana, I. M., Simamora, A. H., & Antara, I. G. W. S.
- Affiliations
- Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha (ID)
- Venue
- Indonesian Journal of Instruction
- Publisher
- Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha
- Published
- 2025-01-25
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-8
- ISSN
- 2745-8628 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W7081914064
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 2
- FWCI
- 11.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Indonesian Journal of Instruction (publishedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Hearing Impairment and Communication
- Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
- Keywords
- assistive technology, mathematics learning, hearing loss, inclusive education, elementary school, abstract mathematical concepts, teacher expectations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review