Cited by 1Vocational and Entrepreneurial EducationEvaluation and Performance AssessmentVocational Education and Training

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Evaluation of Field Work Practice Programs with Using Logic Model

Open access
Juliwardi, Ilham, ., Sukardi, ., Krismadinata·2019·Journal of Education Research and Evaluation

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the Implementation of Field Work Practices of SMK Negeri 1 Padang. Evaluation of Field Work Practices is seen from the aspects of Input, Process, Output, Outcome faced in the implementation of street vendors. The research method used is a combination of Concurrent Embedded design methods, combining quantitative and qualitative research methods sequentially, where in the first stage the study uses quantitative methods and in the second stage qualitative methods. The results showed that the Implementation of Field Work Practices at SMK Negeri 1 Padang Electrical Engineering expertise program as a whole included. Input evaluation according to reality obtained an average standard score of 74.27% with the Fair category, and Input evaluation according to expectations obtained an average standard score of 89.58% with the Very Good category. Process Indicators according to reality obtained a percentage level of 74.14% with the category Fair. As for the Process indicator as expected, a percentage level of 88.56% was obtained with the Good category. Output indicators according to reality obtained a percentage level of 72.65% with the category Fair. As for the Output indicator as expected, a percentage level of 89.13% was obtained. with the category of Very Good. Outcome indicators according to reality obtained a percentage level of 72.36% with the category Fair. As for the Outcome indicator as expected, a percentage level of 88.41% was obtained with the Good category. Based on the findings of this study it was concluded that the Field Work Practices program for students in the SMK Negeri 1 Padang were still in the Fair category, which needed to be improved for each aspect.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.23887/jere.v3i3.21854

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Creswell, John W. 2014. Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Method Approaches Research Design. United States of America: Sage Publications. Inc.
  2. Iskandar, 2009. Quantitative Research Methodology. Jakarta: Gaung Persada Press.
  3. Powell, T., & Heneret, E. 2008. Enhancing program performance with logic models Sukirno Sadono, 2012. Introduction to Micro Economic Theory, Second Edition, Jakarta: PT. Grafindo Persada Sukardi. 2012. Educational Evaluation: Principles & Operations. Jakarta: Earth Literacy. Law No.20 of 2003 concerning the National Education System.
  4. Wakhinuddin, 2009. Program Evaluation. Pa dang: UNP Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 1

Metadata

Authors
Juliwardi, I., ., S., & ., K.
Affiliations
Universitas Negeri Padang (ID)
Venue
Journal of Education Research and Evaluation
Published
2019-11-13
Volume
3
Issue
3
Pages
134
ISSN
  • 2549-2675 (ISSN-L)
  • 2597-422X
OpenAlex
W3039578029
Cited by
1
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-sa
Locations
Journal of Education Research and Evaluation (publishedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Vocational and Entrepreneurial Education
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Evaluation and Performance Assessment
  • Social Sciences › Education › Vocational Education and Training
Keywords
field work practice, program evaluation, logic model, vocational high school, electrical engineering education, street vendors, program implementation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation of Field Work Practice Programs with Using Logic Model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.23887/jere.v3i3.21854
The paper
Juliwardi, I., ., S., & ., K. (2019). Evaluation of Field Work Practice Programs with Using Logic Model. Journal of Education Research and Evaluation. https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v3i3.21854