The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Developing data governance standards for using free-text data in research (TexGov)
Open accessAbstract
BackgroundFree-text data represent a vast, untapped source of rich information to guide research and public service delivery. Free-text data contain a wealth of additional detail that, if more accessible, would clarify and supplement information coded in structured data fields. Personal data usually need to be de-identified or anonymised before they can be used for purposes such as audit and research, but there are major challenges in finding effective methods to de-identify free-text that do not damage data utility as a by-product. The main aim of the TexGov project is to work towards data governance standards to enable free-text data to be used safely for public benefit. MethodsWe conducted: a rapid literature review to explore the data governance models used in working with free-text data, plus case studies of systems making de-identified free-text data available for research; we engaged with text mining researchers and the general public to explore barriers and solutions in working with free-text; and we outlined (UK) data protection legislation and regulations for context. ResultsWe reviewed 50 articles and the models of 4 systems providing access to de-identified free-text. The main emerging themes were: i) patient involvement at identifiable and de-identified data stages; ii) questions of consent and notification for the reuse of free-text data; iii) working with identifiable data for Natural Language Processing algorithm development; and iv) de-identification methods and thresholds of reliability. ConclusionWe have proposed a set of recommendations, including: ensuring public transparency in data flows and uses; adhering to the principles of minimal data extraction; treating de-identified blacklisted free-text as potentially identifiable with use limited to accredited data safe-havens; and, the need to commit to a culture of continuous improvement to understand the relationships between accuracy of de-identification and re-identification risk, so this can be communicated to all stakeholders.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Trusted Decision-Making: Data Governance for Creating Trust in Data Science Decision Outcomes
Brous, P., & Janssen, M. (2020) · Administrative Sciences · doi:10.3390/admsci10040081 · Cited by 43
“Data governance is important for creating value and moderating risk in data science initiatives (Foster et al. 2018; Jones et al. 2019), as it can help organizations make use of data as a competitive asset (Morabito 2015).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Jones, K., Ford, E., Lea, N., Griffiths, L., Heys, S., & Squires, E.
- Affiliations
- Swansea University (GB)
- Brighton and Sussex Medical School (GB)
- University College London (GB)
- Venue
- International Journal of Population Data Science
- Publisher
- Swansea University
- Published
- 2019-11-26
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 3
- ISSN
- 2399-4908 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2990960157
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 0.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- International Journal for Population Data Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Economic and Social Research Council (ES/S007393/1, ES/L007444/1)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Research Data Management Practices
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Thoreau and American Literature
- Keywords
- free-text data, data governance, de-identification, re-identification risk, data protection law, natural language processing, text mining, patient involvement, government data
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review