Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 179

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Development of Practical PDA Logic for Multitarget Tracking by Microprocessor

Fitzgerald, Robert J.·1986·1986 American Control Conference

Abstract

A simplified form of probabilistic data association (PDA) logic was developed for real-time multitarget tracking by a microprocessor associated with a radar track-while-scan system. A variety of practical problems with the method led to a relatively complex set of algorithms, while certain fundamental shortcomings of the approach still threatened performance due to anomalous behavior in some situations. Ultimately, the weighted-average updating feature of the PDA approach was abandoned in favor of a "nearest-neighbor PDA" method, which utilizes the PDA association probabilities to associate a single measurement with each track.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.23919/acc.1986.4789059

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 179

Metadata

Authors
Fitzgerald, R. J.
Venue
1986 American Control Conference
Publisher
IEEE
Published
1986-06
Pages
889-898
ISSN
0743-1619 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2113024825
Cited by
179
References
0
FWCI
1.16
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Development of Practical PDA Logic for Multitarget Tracking by Microprocessor. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.23919/acc.1986.4789059
The paper
Fitzgerald, R. J. (1986). Development of Practical PDA Logic for Multitarget Tracking by Microprocessor. 1986 American Control Conference. https://doi.org/10.23919/acc.1986.4789059

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.