Virtual Patient Generation using Physiological Models through a Compressed Latent Parameterization
Abstract
This paper presents a data-driven approach to generating virtual patients using mathematical models of physiological processes. Such models often contain a large number of tunable parameters that must be calibrated to capture the observed characteristics of each real patient in a dataset. By sampling from this parameter space, potentially new virtual patients can be generated. However, it is often the case that the resulting set of virtual patients contains members that exhibit physiologically unrealistic behavior. In the present work, we employ a practically important case study on the modeling of cardiovascular responses to hemorrhage and fluid resuscitation in order to demonstrate that subject-specific characteristics observed in a dataset can be alternatively represented within a highly compressed latent parameter space without significant losses in calibration error for each real patient. Then, we show that by sampling from this latent parameter space, it is possible to generate new virtual patients that also exhibit physiologically realistic behavior.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Patient models used in PCLC evaluation are typically systems of ordinary differential equations, such as reduced order ODEs governing whole-body hemodynamics.
“Patient models used in PCLC evaluation are typically systems of ordinary differential equations (ODEs), such as reduced order ODEs governing whole-body hemodynamics [37].”
From Credibility assessment of in silico clinical trials for medical devices (2024) · cites this paper as [37]
[37] defines a method for generating synthetic patients from calibrated subject-specific virtual patients, for a hemorrhage/fluid resuscitation model, that attempts to minimize sampling from non-physiologic parameter space.
“For example, [37] defines a method for generating synthetic patients from calibrated subject-specific virtual patients, for a hemorrhage/fluid resuscitation model, that attempts to minimize sampling from non-physiologic parameter space.”
From Credibility assessment of in silico clinical trials for medical devices (2024) · cites this paper as [37]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 23 · Cited by 12
- Authors
- Tivay, A., Kramer, G. C., & Hahn, J.-O.
- Affiliations
- University of Maryland, College Park (US)
- The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (US)
- Venue
- 2020 American Control Conference (ACC)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2020-07
- Pages
- 1335-1340
- ISSN
- 0743-1619 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3045757664
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4
- FWCI
- 15.54
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Proceedings of the ... American Control Conference/Proceedings of the American Control Conference (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Model Reduction and Neural Networks
- Keywords
- physiological modeling, parameter space sampling, model calibration, fluid resuscitation, subject-specific modeling
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review