Triaxial rehabilitative data analysis incorporating matching pursuit
Abstract
The continuing drive for better rehabilitative healthcare hinges on the availability of sensor data which can be shared and analysed. This leverages on the widespread communications network to provide an integrated health management environment. For this paper, we delineate our current work in sensorizing rehabilitative tests of upper limb movements. Where previously we applied data driven analysis, we now employ time-frequency methods to provide a better analytical basis for our derivations. The use of Matching Pursuit algorithm in biological signals has concentrated on brain signals and much less on human motion. Thus we contribute to efficacy of the algorithm by employing it on rehabilitative data collected from widely available sensors. We describe how we obtained the parameters based on pre-analysing an available data set. By selecting the most useful signal constituents and applying this to signal denoising, we are able to better classify the condition of a patient automatically - which shows encouraging promise in the quest for integrative healthcare.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Two included works used the Action Research Arm Test.
“Two of the included works used the ARAT system [66,72]”
From Wearable sensors and machine learning in post-stroke rehabilitation assessment: A systematic review (2022) · cites this paper as [72]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wearable sensors and machine learning in post-stroke rehabilitation assessment: A systematic review
Boukhennoufa, I., Zhai, X., Utti, V., Jackson, J., & McDonald-Maier, K. D. (2022) · Biomedical Signal Processing and Control · doi:10.1016/j.bspc.2021.103197 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
“The US, is the country with most publications with thirteen papers [46,47,49,52,54,58, 64–67,69,70,73] followed by china with four papers [41,51,53,68], three papers for South Korea [45,61,74] and Italy [55–57], two papers for the UK [50,71] and Thailand [59,60] and finally a single study for France [42], India [43],…”
BackgroundMethodInfluential
- Authors
- Lee, T. K. M., Leo, K.-H., Sanei, S., Chew, E., & Zhao, L.
- Affiliations
- Monash University Malaysia (MY)
- Singapore Polytechnic (SG)
- University of Surrey (GB)
- National University Hospital (SG)
- Venue
- 2017 25th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2017-08
- Volume
- 52
- Pages
- 434-438
- OpenAlex
- W2765417352
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 4 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO) (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Ministry of Education - Singapore
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Mathematical Analysis and Transform Methods
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
- Keywords
- matching pursuit, upper limb rehabilitation, human motion analysis, time-frequency analysis, signal denoising, wearable sensors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review