Non-Negative Kernel Graphs for Time-Varying Signals Using Visibility Graphs
Abstract
We present a novel framework to represent sets of time-varying signals as dynamic graphs using the non-negative kernel (NNK) graph construction. We extend the original NNK framework to allow explicit delays as part of the graph construction, so that unlike in NNK, two nodes can be connected with an edge corresponding to a non-zero time delay, if there is higher similarity between the signals after shifting one of them. We also propose to characterize the similarity between signals at different nodes using the node degree and clustering coefficients of their respective visibility graphs. Graph edges that can representing temporal delays, we provide a new perspective that enables us to see the effect of synchronization in graph construction for time-series signals. For both temperature and EEG datasets, we show that our proposed approach can achieve sparse and interpretable graph representations. Furthermore, the proposed method can be useful in characterizing different EEG experiments using sparsity.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Visibility graphs offer an effective means of representing sequential signals by connecting data points according to their value-based visibility, thereby preserving the underlying temporal structure while introducing geometric relationships.
“To this end, visibility graphs offer an effective means of representing sequential signals by connecting data points according to their value-based visibility, thereby preserving the underlying temporal structure while introducing geometric relationships [22], [23].”
From Emotion Classification With Visibility Graphs (2025) · cites this paper as [23]
Cites
From time series to complex networks: the visibility graph
Lacasa, L., Luque, B., Ballesteros, F., Luque, J., & Nuño, J. C. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0709247105 · Cited by 1,826 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Emotion Classification With Visibility Graphs
Şimşek, E., Topcu, A., Koç, E., Saritas, E. U., & Koç, A. (2025) · IEEE Signal Processing Letters · doi:10.1109/lsp.2025.3567033 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“To this end, visibility graphs offer an effective means of representing sequential signals by connecting data points according to their value-based visibility, thereby preserving the underlying temporal structure while introducing geometric relationships [22], [23].”
- Authors
- Bozkurt, E., & Ortega, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Southern California (US)
- ORCID
- Ortega, Antonio
- Venue
- 2022 30th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2022-08-29
- Pages
- 1781-1785
- OpenAlex
- W4312499468
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 0.18
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Time Series Analysis and Forecasting
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Topological and Geometric Data Analysis
- Keywords
- visibility graph, time-varying signals, dynamic graphs, time delay, signal synchronization, node degree, clustering coefficient, EEG, temperature time series, sparse graph representation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review