Cited by 1Time Series Analysis and ForecastingComplex Systems and Time Series AnalysisTopological and Geometric Data Analysis

Non-Negative Kernel Graphs for Time-Varying Signals Using Visibility Graphs

Bozkurt, Ecem, Ortega, Antonio·2022·2022 30th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO)

Abstract

We present a novel framework to represent sets of time-varying signals as dynamic graphs using the non-negative kernel (NNK) graph construction. We extend the original NNK framework to allow explicit delays as part of the graph construction, so that unlike in NNK, two nodes can be connected with an edge corresponding to a non-zero time delay, if there is higher similarity between the signals after shifting one of them. We also propose to characterize the similarity between signals at different nodes using the node degree and clustering coefficients of their respective visibility graphs. Graph edges that can representing temporal delays, we provide a new perspective that enables us to see the effect of synchronization in graph construction for time-series signals. For both temperature and EEG datasets, we show that our proposed approach can achieve sparse and interpretable graph representations. Furthermore, the proposed method can be useful in characterizing different EEG experiments using sparsity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.23919/eusipco55093.2022.9909594

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Visibility graphs offer an effective means of representing sequential signals by connecting data points according to their value-based visibility, thereby preserving the underlying temporal structure while introducing geometric relationships.

    “To this end, visibility graphs offer an effective means of representing sequential signals by connecting data points according to their value-based visibility, thereby preserving the underlying temporal structure while introducing geometric relationships [22], [23].”

    From Emotion Classification With Visibility Graphs (2025) · cites this paper as [23]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • Emotion Classification With Visibility Graphs

    Şimşek, E., Topcu, A., Koç, E., Saritas, E. U., & Koç, A. (2025) · IEEE Signal Processing Letters · doi:10.1109/lsp.2025.3567033 · Cited by 2 · see citing works

    “To this end, visibility graphs offer an effective means of representing sequential signals by connecting data points according to their value-based visibility, thereby preserving the underlying temporal structure while introducing geometric relationships [22], [23].”

Authors
Bozkurt, E., & Ortega, A.
Affiliations
University of Southern California (US)
Venue
2022 30th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2022-08-29
Pages
1781-1785
OpenAlex
W4312499468
Cited by
1
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1
FWCI
0.18
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Time Series Analysis and Forecasting
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Topological and Geometric Data Analysis
Keywords
visibility graph, time-varying signals, dynamic graphs, time delay, signal synchronization, node degree, clustering coefficient, EEG, temperature time series, sparse graph representation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review