The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Privacy-preserving collaborative filtering algorithm based on local differential privacy
Abstract
Mobile edge computing (MEC) is an emerging technolohgy that extends cloud computing to the edge of a network. MEC has been applied to a variety of services. Specially, MEC can help to reduce network delay and improve the service quality of recommendation systems. In a MEC-based recommendation system, users' rating data are collected and analyzed by the edge servers. If the servers behave dishonestly or break down, users' privacy may be disclosed. To solve this issue, we design a recommendation framework that applies local differential privacy (LDP) to collaborative filtering. In the proposed framework, users' rating data are perturbed to satisfy LDP and then released to the edge servers. The edge servers perform partial computing task by using the perturbed data. The cloud computing center computes the similarity between items by using the computing results generated by edge servers. We propose a data perturbation method to protect user's original rating values, where the Harmony mechanism is modified so as to preserve the accuracy of similarity computation. And to enhance the protection of privacy, we propose two methods to protect both users' rating values and rating behaviors. Experimental results on real-world data demonstrate that the proposed methods perform better than existing differentially private recommendation methods.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Various privacy preservation methodologies, such as randomization, differential privacy, secure multiparty computation, and homomorphic encryption, can be applied to build decentralized PPRS.
“To address these vulnerabilities, various privacy preservation methodologies, such as randomization, differential privacy, secure multiparty computation, and homomorphic encryption, can be applied to build decentralized PPRS [14, 129-132, 138, 139, 141].”
From A Deep Dive into Fairness, Bias, Threats, and Privacy in Recommender Systems: Insights and Future Research (2024) · cites this paper as [131]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Roy, F., Ding, X., Choo, K. K. R., & Zhou, P. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2409.12651 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Bao, T., Xu, L., Zhu, L., Wang, L., Li, R., & Li, T.
- Affiliations
- Beijing Institute of Technology (CN)
- National Computer Network Emergency Response Technical Team/Coordination Center of Chinar (CN)
- China International Engineering Consulting Corporation, Beijing 100048, China
- Venue
- China Communications
- Published
- 2021-11
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 42-60
- ISSN
- 1673-5447 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3216645980
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6
- FWCI
- 1.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- China Communications (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Recommender Systems and Techniques
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
- Keywords
- local differential privacy, collaborative filtering, mobile edge computing, recommender systems, user privacy preservation, data perturbation, cloud-edge collaboration
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review