Cited by 9Authorship Attribution and ProfilingUser Authentication and Security SystemsDigital Communication and Language

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Exploring Keystroke Dynamics and Stylometry Features for Gender Prediction on Chat Data

Li, Guoqiang, Borj, Parisa Rezaee, Bergeron, Loic, Bours, Patrick·2019·2019 42nd International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (MIPRO)

Abstract

Online anonymity is considered as one of the great gifts of the Internet, but it also brings dangers to society, such as cybercrime, online sexual abuse and bullying, and love scams. Many people are fond of chatting online to make new friends, but how can they be sure that the person sitting behind the other computer is really the person they claim to be? By studying stylometry and keystroke dynamics features from chat data, it is feasible to reveal the actual gender of an online user. In this paper, we examined stylometry and keystroke dynamics features from chat data, and proposed a Random Forest based gender prediction approach by analyzing these features. In order to evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed approach, a data acquisition was conducted to capture the keystroke dynamics and text information when participants were chatting remotely via Skype. All participants were invited to chat freely on any topic they prefered in order to get to know each other. Based on our experimental result, the proposed approach achieved 72% prediction accuracy by analyzing on this free-text data captured only in 15 minutes.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.23919/mipro.2019.8756740

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Predators might conceal the gender or age while making initial contact.

    “For example, they might conceal the gender or age while making initial contact [48,50].”
  • Predators often use a fake identity while online searching for potential victims.

    “It is known that predators often use a fake identity while online searching for potential victims.”
  • A combination of text features and keystroke dynamics characteristics can improve authorship profiling performance where texts are short and might not provide enough information for predatory detection.

    “It is shown that a combination of both feature sets can improve the authorship profiling performance where the texts are short and might not provide enough information for predatory detection.”
  • Li et al. considered the ratio of applying the delete key, the number of letters in the word, and the number of characters in each message to train an RF-based gender prediction model.

    “In addition to the timing feature sets, they considered the ratio of applying the delete key, the number of letters in the word, and the number of characters in each message to train an RF-based gender prediction model [48].”
  • Li et al. collected chat conversation from Skype and extracted keystroke dynamics and stylometry features to detect the gender of online authors.

    “As an example, one can consider the work by Li et al. [48], where they collected the chat conversation from the Skype platform and extracted keystroke dynamics and stylometry features to detect the gender of online authors.”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. 10.1145/3099023.3099105 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1016/j.diin.2018.01.018 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 2019, Cornell math explorer’s project
  4. 10.1016/j.istr.2012.02.001 · DOI
  5. 10.13176/11.427 · DOI
  6. 10.1109/TIFS.2017.2658539 · DOI
  7. mondal, 2017, Importance of a Versatile Logging Tool for Behavioural Biometrics and Continuous Authentication Research, 282
  8. 10.1016/j.diin.2011.04.002 · DOI
  9. 10.1109/IISA.2015.7388069 · DOI
  10. burger, 2011, Discriminating gender on twitter, Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 1301
  11. 10.3115/v1/D14-1155 · DOI
  12. 2019, A young norwegian boy commited his life
  13. abelson, 2001, By the water cooler in cyberspace the talk turns ugly
  14. 10.4018/IJDCF.2017010101 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Li, G., Borj, P. R., Bergeron, L., & Bours, P.
Affiliations
Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
Venue
2019 42nd International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (MIPRO)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2019-05
Pages
1049-1054
OpenAlex
W2957717733
Cited by
9
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2
FWCI
0.48
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Authorship Attribution and Profiling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › User Authentication and Security Systems
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Digital Communication and Language
Keywords
keystroke dynamics, stylometry, gender prediction, online anonymity, user identification, random forest, text features

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review