Democratic Legitimacy: Impartiality, Reflexivity, Proximity
Abstract
It's a commonplace occurrence that citizens in Western democracies are disaffected with their political leaders and traditional democratic institutions. But this book argues that this crisis of confidence is partly a crisis of understanding. The book makes the case that the sources of democratic legitimacy have shifted and multiplied over the past thirty years and that we need to comprehend and make better use of these new sources of legitimacy in order to strengthen our political self-belief and commitment to democracy. Drawing on examples from France and the United States, the book notes that there has been a major expansion of independent commissions, NGOs, regulatory authorities, and watchdogs in recent decades. At the same time, constitutional courts have become more willing and able to challenge legislatures. These institutional developments, which serve the democratic values of impartiality and reflexivity, have been accompanied by a new attentiveness to what the book calls the value of proximity, as governing structures have sought to find new spaces for minorities, the particular, and the local. To improve our democracies, we need to use these new sources of legitimacy more effectively and we need to incorporate them into our accounts of democratic government. This book is an original contribution to the vigorous international debate about democratic authority and legitimacy.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The oath that bureaucrats take is to display fidelity to the law and defend the constitution, not the government of the day.
“Finally, it is important to emphasize that the oath that bureaucrats take is to display ' fidelity to the law ' (Selznick, 1992), and defend the constitution, not the government of the day (Heath, 2020; Rosanvallon, 2011).”
From The Guardian State: Strengthening the public service against democratic backsliding (2024) · cites this paper as Rosanvallon, 2011
Rosanvallon (2011) contends that although bureaucracy is unelected, its role in translating the will of elected officials into concrete actions is essential for democratic governance.
“He contends that while bureaucracy is often characterized by its unelected nature, its role in translating the will of elected officials into concrete actions is essential for democratic governance.”
From The Guardian State: Strengthening the public service against democratic backsliding (2024) · cites this paper as Rosanvallon (2011)
The weakness of the liberal democratic state vis-à-vis illiberal populism lies in the principle of neutrality.
“The rise of authoritarian and populist political movements shows inexorably where the weakness of the liberal democratic state vis-a-vis rising levels of illiberal populism lies: the principle of neutrality (Heath, 2020; Rosanvallon, 2011).”
From The Guardian State: Strengthening the public service against democratic backsliding (2024) · cites this paper as Rosanvallon, 2011
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
Cited by 121
- Authors
- Rosanvallon, P.
- Corresponding author
- Rosanvallon, Pierre
- Venue
- Princeton University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Princeton University Press
- Published
- 2011-07-25
- OpenAlex
- W4244799621
- Cited by
- 121
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 3.91
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Princeton University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Philosophy and Ethics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Public Administration and Governance
- Keywords
- democratic legitimacy, democratic authority, independent commissions, non-governmental organizations, regulatory agencies, watchdog, constitutional courts, reflexivity, impartiality, localism, minority representation, democratic government, France, United States
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review