Hacking Diversity: The Politics of Inclusion in Open Technology Cultures
Abstract
Hacking, as a mode of technical and cultural production, is commonly celebrated for its extraordinary freedoms of creation and circulation. Yet surprisingly few women participate in it: rates of involvement by technologically skilled women are drastically lower in hacking communities than in industry and academia. This book investigates the activists engaged in free and open-source software to understand why, despite their efforts, they fail to achieve the diversity that their ideals support. The book shows that within this well-meaning volunteer world, beyond the sway of human resource departments and equal opportunity legislation, members of underrepresented groups face unique challenges. The book explores who participates in voluntaristic technology cultures, to what ends, and with what consequences. Digging deep into the fundamental assumptions underpinning STEM-oriented societies, the book demonstrates that while the preferred solutions of tech enthusiasts—their “hacks” of projects and cultures—can ameliorate some of the “bugs” within their own communities, these methods come up short for issues of unequal social and economic power. Distributing “diversity” in technical production is not equal to generating justice. The book reframes questions of diversity advocacy to consider what interventions might appropriately broaden inclusion and participation in the hacking world and beyond.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
OSS's roots in libertarianism, masculine technologies, and techno-determinism have resulted in an apathetic attitude toward social issues.
“Despite OSS's origin as an alternative technology movement subverting privatization and commercial forces, OSS's roots in libertarianism, masculine technologies, and techno-determinism have resulted in an apathetic attitude toward social issues [7].”
From Codes of Conduct in Open Source (2024) · cites this paper as [7]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Codes of Conduct in Open Source
Frluckaj, H., & Howison, J. (2024) · Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion in Software Engineering · doi:10.1007/978-1-4842-9651-6_17 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Dunbar-Hester, C.
- Corresponding author
- Dunbar-Hester, Christina
- Venue
- Princeton University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Princeton University Press
- Published
- 2019-12-10
- OpenAlex
- W4242839368
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 0.54
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Princeton University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Technology in Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Open Source Software Innovations
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
- Keywords
- hacking, free and open source software, diversity in technology, women in technology, underrepresented groups, volunteer communities, inclusion, social justice, gender inequality, hacktivism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review