The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE EQUALISES LOW-DIGITAL MICROENTERPRISE CAPABILITY
Abstract
This study investigates whether a generative AI copilot can raise marketplace performance for micro and small enterprises and whether the gains concentrate among lower-ability sellers. Across a 12-week randomized controlled field trial, 240 Manado sellers were evenly split between a high-traffic mall and a residential area and assigned either to business-as-usual or to an AI copilot that generated optimized titles, persuasive descriptions, relevant tags, and photo guidance for their TikTok videos. We tracked the click-through rate, conversion rate, average order value, buyer rating, and an internal listing-quality index, and estimated causal effects using difference-in-differences models with seller-clustered standard errors. Compared with the control, the AI treatment increased click-through and conversion rates, raised the average order value by approximately IDR 19,000, improved ratings, and enhanced listing quality, with more potent effects in the residential segment. Mediation analysis showed that AI primarily improved listing quality; the resulting quality gains translated into higher conversion rates, and the indirect effect was statistically significant. The approach is scalable as a low-cost, platform-embedded marketing aid in urban markets.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Interactive components of digital MSMEs ecosystem for inclusive digital economy in Indonesia
Aminullah, E., Fizzanty, T., Nawawi, N., Suryanto, J., Pranata, N., Maulana, I., Ariyani, L., Wicaksono, A., Suardi, I., Azis, N. L. L., et al. (2024) · Journal of the Knowledge Economy · doi:10.1007/s13132-022-01086-8 · Cited by 74
Metadata
- Authors
- Pangkey, D. A. J. P., & Lintong, E. H.
- Venue
- EKUITAS (Jurnal Ekonomi dan Keuangan)
- Published
- 2026-06-25
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 110-124
- ISSN
- 2548-5024
- 1411-0393
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 1
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.