The DOI matches its Crossref record.
STUDI KRITIK MATAN HADIST
Abstract
AbstractThe purpose of this study is to describe the methodological study of hadith criticism. The research method is used with the approach of library study through the source of the library from various sources of literature about the methodology of the study of hadith criticism. Then analyzed and presented the data findings objectively. The result of this study is that the criticism of matan hadith is an attempt to research the hadith that is sahīh, in order to know if the hadith is maqbūl or mardūd. As for the steps are: Matan research reviewed from the quality of his isnay, researching the editor of the matan that is as good as it is, researching the content of matan and the latter is concluding the results of matan research. Then there are two methods of criticism that have been used from classical times to modern times, namely the muqāranah method and the mu'āradhah method. This method has been applied by the companions and tabi'in. This shows that criticism of hadith is necessary to be done with the aim of avoiding forgery against the hadith. AbstrakTujuan penelitian ini untuk mendeskripsikan tentang metodologis studi kritik matan hadits. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dengan pendekatan studi pustaka melalui sumber pustaka dari berbagai sumber literatur tentang metodologis studi kritik matan haditst. Kemudian dianalisis dan disajikan hasil temuan data secara objektif. Hasil dari penelitian ini yaitu kritik matan hadits adalah suatu upaya kegiatan penelitian terhadap matan-matan hadits yang sanad-nya sahīh, dalam rangka untuk mengetahui apakah hadits tersebut maqbūl ataupun mardūd. Adapun langkah-langkahnya yaitu: Penelitian matan yang ditinjau dari kualitas sanad-nya, meneliti redaksi matan yang semakna, meneliti kandungan matan dan yang terakhir adalah menyimpulkan hasil penelitian matan. Kemudian ada dua metode kritik matan yang sudah dipakai sejak zaman klasik hingga zaman modern, yaitu metode muqāranah dan metode mu’āradhah. Metode inilah yang sudah diterapkan oleh para sahabat dan para tabi’in. Hal demikian menunjukkan bahwa kritik matan hadits sangat perlu untuk dilakukan dengan tujuan agar menghindari pemalsuan terhadap matan hadits. Kata Kunci: Matan, Langkah dan Metode.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“As Devi (2020) explained, muqāranah is not limited to examining differences in the isnād.It also aims to identify the most authentic formulation of the matn as originally spoken by the Prophet SAW.”
From Evolution of Hadith Textual Criticism: From Classical to Contemporary Approaches (2025) · cites this paper as Devi, 2020
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- Bakir, Muhammad. ‚Kritik Matan Hadits Versi Muhaddisin dan Fuqoha': Studi Pemikiran Hasjim Abbas.‛ Jurnal Samawat, Vol. 2, no. 2 (2018).
- Dalhari. ‚Studi Pemikiran Hadits Ulama Mesir: Konsep Imâm al- Syâfi'î tentang Sunnah dan Solusi Hadits Mukhtalif.‛ Jurnal Ilmu Ushuludin, Vol. 10, no. 1 (2011).
- Haris, Munawwir. ‚Kritik Matan Hadits: Versi Ahli-Ahli Hadits.‛ Jurnal Al-Irfani Vol. 1, no. 1 (2011).
- Hudaya, Hairul. ‚Metodologi Kritik Matan Hadis Menurut Al- Adlabidari Teori Ke Aplikasi.‛ Jurnal Ilmu Ushuludin, Vol. 13, no. 1 (2014).
- Luthfi, Khabibi Muhammad. ‚Kritik Matan Sebagai Metode Utama Dalam Kesahihan Haditst Nabi.‛ Jurnal Islamic Review, Vol. 2, no. 3 (2013).
- Muhlis, Masrukhin. ‚Kritik Matan Hadits Studi Komparatif Antara Sarjana Muslim dan Sarjana Barat.‛ Jurnal Al- Qalam, Vol. 34, no. 1 (2017).
- Mutmainnah. ‚Metodologi Ulama Hadits dalam Membentengi Hadits dari Segi Matan.‛ Jurnal Al-Thiqah, Vol. 1, no. 1 (2018).
- Qomarullah, Muhammad. ‚Metode Kritik Matan Hadis Muhammad Tāhir Al-Jawābī dalam Kitab: Juhud al- Muhaddisin Fi Naqd Matan al-Hadis an-Nabawi asy- Syarif.‛ Jurnal Studi Al-Qur'an dan Hadits, Vol. 2, no. 1 (2018).
- Yasmanta, Ali, dan Ratnawati. ‚Studi Kritik Matan Hadits: Kajian Teoritis dan Aplikatif Untuk Menguji Keshahihan Matan Hadits.‛ Al-Bukhari: Jurnal Ilmu Hadits, Vol. 2, no. 2 (2019).
- Zubaidah. ‚Metode Kritik Sanad dan Matan Hadits.‛ Jurnal Komunikasi dan Pendidikan Islam, Vol. 4, no. 1 (2015).
Cited by
Evolution of Hadith Textual Criticism: From Classical to Contemporary Approaches
Razak, N. M. A. M., Nazri, M. A., Majid, L. A., Amran, N. N., & Ibrahim, N. S. (2025) · Global Journal Al-Thaqafah · doi:10.7187/gjatsi122025-2 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Devi, A.
- Venue
- Al-Dzikra: Jurnal Studi Ilmu al-Qur'an dan al-Hadits
- Published
- 2020-12-25
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 293-312
- ISSN
- 2714-7916
- 1978-0893
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
