The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A MODEL FOR DEVELOPING HIGH-QUALITY ONLINE COURSES: INTEGRATING A SYSTEMS APPROACH WITH LEARNING THEORY
Open accessAbstract
As the demand for online education continues to increase, institutions are faced with developing process models for efficient, high-quality online course development. This paper describes a systems, team-based, approach that centers on an online instructional design theory (Active Mastery Learning) implemented at Colorado State University-Global Campus. CSU-Global Campus is a newly-created online campus within the Colorado State University System, and launches in Fall 2008 with fully-online undergraduate degree completion programs and Master’s degrees.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Adoption can be slow because faculty serve many roles, functioning as graphic artist, web designer, and instructional designer (Puzziferro & Shelton, 2008).”
From Students' Perceptions of Quality Across Four Course Development Models (2018) · cites this paper as Puzziferro & Shelton, 2008
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Differentiation of Roles: Instructional Designers and Faculty in the Creation of Online Courses
Halupa, C. (2019) · International Journal of Higher Education · doi:10.5430/ijhe.v8n1p55 · Cited by 61
Students' Perceptions of Quality Across Four Course Development Models
Brown, V. S., Lewis, D., & Toussaint, M. (2018) · Online Learning · doi:10.24059/olj.v22i2.1213 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Puzziferro, M., & Shelton, K.
- Affiliations
- Dallas Baptist University (US)
- ORCID
- Shelton, Kaye
- Venue
- Online Learning
- Publisher
- The Online Learning Consortium
- Published
- 2008-09-01
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 3-4
- ISSN
- 1092-8235 (ISSN-L)
- 2472-5730
- 2472-5749
- OpenAlex
- W4254404283
- Cited by
- 62
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3
- FWCI
- 1.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Online Learning (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology and E-Learning
- Social Sciences › Education › Open Education and E-Learning
- Keywords
- online course design, systems approach, learning theory, instructional design, online learning, course quality
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
