The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Disability Unit Practitioners at Stellenbosch University: Covid‑19 Pandemic Reflections
Open accessAbstract
As reflective practitioners working in disability inclusion, we constantly work with shifting realities concerning our students, who are not a homogenous group. The coronavirus pandemic (Covid‑19) was a reality least expected in 2020, yet we used our flexible approach to make the transition as smooth as we possibly could. The Disability Unit (DU) is one of five units located within the Centre for Student Counselling and Development at Stellenbosch University (SU) and falls within the responsibility centre of the Deputy Vice-Chancellor: Teaching and Learning. The DU was founded in 2007 and is 15 years old in 2021. We aim to foster disability inclusion within a transformative framework at SU, with our main focus on students with disabilities. Our wider aim is universal access, which includes working towards the removal of cultural, social, language and disability barriers in the higher education context. We are guided by the Disability Access Policy (2018) of SU. Since the latter part of March 2020, we had to shift to online teaching and learning. This came at a time when we were preparing for the end of the term and student support was being put in place. The onset of Covid‑19 occasioned unanticipated reflections and challenges, which we share in this article. We also reflect on what we have learnt and how we can move forward in a changed academic environment catapulted into a digital world. We do this reflection by following the Gibbs’ reflective cycle (Gibbs, 1988) which offers a way to reflect and learn from experience. The cycle is weaved into the reflections as it follows a process of describing the context of the DU, expressing how the Covid‑19 pandemic was felt by staff and students, evaluating and learning from what was experienced. According to Lyner-Cleophas (2020), online learning has benefits and challenges, especially considering students with disabilities.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Several students expressed the requirement for further instruction prior to their participation in discussions, ability to access educational resources and completion of assessments.
“According to Lyner-Cleophas et al. (2021), several students expressed the requirement for further instruction prior to their participation in discussions, ability to access educational resources and completion of assessments.”
From Equitable access to digital higher education for students with disabilities in South Africa (2025) · cites this paper as Lyner-Cleophas et al. 2021
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Equitable access to digital higher education for students with disabilities in South Africa
Zongozzi, J., & Ngubane, S. (2025) · African Journal of Disability · doi:10.4102/ajod.v14i0.1525 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Lyner‑Cleophas, M., Apollis, L., Erasmus, I., Willems, M., Poole, L., Minnaar, M., & Louw, P.
- Affiliations
- Stellenbosch University, South Africa
- Stellenbosch University (ZA)
- ORCID
- Willems, Melanie
- Venue
- Journal for Students Affairs in Africa
- Publisher
- University of Pretoria - ESI Press
- Published
- 2021-05-31
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 223-234
- ISSN
- 2307-6267 (ISSN-L)
- 2311-1771
- OpenAlex
- W3173702385
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2
- FWCI
- 1.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-sa
- Locations
- Journal of Student Affairs in Africa (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Education during COVID-19 pandemic
- Social Sciences › Education › Disability Education and Employment
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disability Rights and Representation
- Keywords
- disability inclusion, students with disabilities, COVID-19 pandemic, online learning, student support services, higher education, disability barriers, universal access, reflective practice, Gibbs' reflective cycle, Stellenbosch University
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review