Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 239

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Work from Home After the COVID-19 Outbreak

Arizona State University, Bick, Alexander, Blandin, Adam, Virginia Commonwealth University, Mertens, Karel, Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas·2020·Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, Working Papers

Abstract

Based on rich novel survey data, we document that 35.2 percent of the US workforce worked entirely from home in May 2020, up from 8.2 percent in February.Highly educated, high-income and white workers were more likely to shift to working from home and maintain employment following the pandemic.Individuals working from home daily before the pandemic lost employment at similar rates as daily commuters.This suggests that, apart from the potential for home-based work, demand conditions also mattered for job losses.We find that 71.7 percent of workers that could work from home effectively did so in May.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.24149/wp2017r1

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Arizona State University, Bick, A., Blandin, A., Virginia Commonwealth University, Mertens, K., & Dallas, F. R. B. O.
Venue
Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, Working Papers
Published
2020-07
Volume
2020
Issue
2017
OpenAlex
W3121735433
Cited by
239
References
0
FWCI
44.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.