Cited by 0Physiological and biochemical adaptationsCrustacean biology and ecologyIsotope Analysis in Ecology

Thermal Effects on the Body mass, Transpiration rate, Feeding and Food Conversion of the Pillbug Armadillo officinalis (Isopoda, Oniscidea) Fed on the Dry Leaf of Punica Granatum

Open access
Youssef, Abdelgader K., Nair, Achuthan·2004·Sultan Qaboos University Journal for Science [SQUJS]

Abstract

Observations were made on the body mass; transpiration rate; assimilation efficiency; gross and net production efficiencies; feeding, assimilation, conversion and metabolic rates of the pillbug Armadillo officinalis Dumeril acclimatized at 14º and 21 °C for 15 days and fed on the dry leaf of Punica granatum (Pomegranate). A brief description is given on the chemical composition of P. granatum leaf. The difference in body mass increments of A. officinalis between the acclimatized temperatures was not significant (t = 1.09; p>0.05). However, significant differences were discernible on the transpiration rate (t = 9.53; p<0.01), moisture (t = 9.01; p<0.01), assimilation efficiency (t = 5.16; p<0.01), feeding (t = 3.76; p<0.05) and conversion (t = 2.58; p<0.05) rates between the woodlice acclimatized at 14º and 21 °C. Better feeding of P. granatum leaf by these animals was observed at 21° C, but better assimilation efficiency at 14 °C. Only 3.21% assimilated food at 14° C and 6.30% at 21 °C were converted into the production of new tissues. The food consumption of A. officinalis at 14º and 21° C was 2.05% and 3.79% body mass/day respectively. The effect of temperature on the activity of A. officinalis in the field is discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.24200/squjs.vol9iss0pp1-5

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 15

Authors
Youssef, A. K., & Nair, A.
Affiliations
University of Benghazi (LY)
Venue
Sultan Qaboos University Journal for Science [SQUJS]
Published
2004-06-01
Volume
9
Pages
1
ISSN
  • 1027-524X (ISSN-L)
  • 2414-536X
OpenAlex
W2610829598
Cited by
0
References
15
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Maǧallaẗ ǧāmiʿaẗ al-Sulṭān Qābūs li-l-ʿulūm/Sultan Qaboos University journal for science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Physiological and biochemical adaptations
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Crustacean biology and ecology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Isotope Analysis in Ecology
Keywords
Armadillo officinalis, Punica granatum, thermal acclimation, body mass, transpiration rate, assimilation efficiency, food conversion efficiency, feeding rate, metabolic rate, leaf chemical composition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review