Cited by 2

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Paisajes agrarios durante los siglos XVIII y XIX en el este catamarqueño. Abordajes desde la arqueología histórica

Nagel, Antonela, Rodríguez Oviedo, Melisa, Quesada, Marcos Nicolás·2023·Relaciones

Abstract

En este trabajo abordamos diferentes procesos sociohistóricos que entre los siglos XVIII y XIX conformaron un paisaje campesino en la serranía de El Alto-Ancasti y cuyas materialidades aún prevalecen en el entorno. Nuestro objetivo es generar información que contribuya a la historización y el entendimiento de los diferentes paisajes culturales serranos. Para ello, metodológicamente incorporamos diversas fuentes de información como los documentos históricos, el trabajo de campo arqueológico y entrevistas etnográficas. Nos centraremos aquí en dos casos que permiten abordar el proceso de transformación del paisaje agrario en El Taco, en el pastizal del sector cumbral, y Oyola, en el bosque serrano a media altura de la ladera oeste de la serranía. Caracterizaremos sucesivos paisajes productivos agropecuarios y estableceremos una genealogía de sus cambios y continuidades, relacionando las transformaciones con el devenir de las condiciones socioeconómicas a escala regional y local.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.24215/18521479e064

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Terraced agricultural practices have largely been abandoned-or are only sporadically utilized-in the semiarid mid-altitude valleys and the montane forests of the eastern slopes.

    “such practices have largely been abandoned-or are only sporadically utilized-in the semiarid mid-altitude valleys and the montane forests of the eastern slopes (Nagel, 2022;Nagel et al., 2023;Zuccarelli Freire et al., 2022).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Difrieri, H. (1945). Morteros indígenas en Ancasti. En: GAEA. Anales de la Sociedad Argentina de Estudios geográficos 2 (7): 417-427.
  2. Gheco, L. (2020). Una aproximación histórica al arte rupestre prehispánico de la sierra de El Alto-Ancasti (provincia de Catamarca, Noroeste argentino). Estudios Atacameños 65: 263-290. https://dx.doi.org/10.22199/ issn.0718-1043-2020-0030 · DOI
  3. Ingold, T. (1987). Territoriality and tenure: the appropriation of space in hunting and gathering societies. The appropriation of nature. Essays on human ecology and social relations. University of Iowa Press. Iowa City.
  4. Quesada, M. N., Gastaldi, M. y Granizo, G. (2012). Construcción de periferias y producción de lo local en las cumbres de El Alto-Ancasti. Relaciones de la Sociedad Argentina de Antropología 37 (2): 435-456.
  5. Quesada, M., Zuccarelli, V., Ghecco, L., Gastaldi, M., Boscatto, S. y Moreno, E. (2017). Paisaje y experiencia en Oyola a finales del primer milenio D.C. (Dpto. El Alto, Catamarca). Comechingonia. Revista de Arqueología 20 (2): 13-42. https://doi.org/10.37603/2250.7728.v20.n2.18043 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Nagel, A., Rodríguez Oviedo, M., & Quesada, M. N.
Venue
Relaciones
Published
2023-07-11
Volume
48
Issue
1
Pages
064
ISSN
  • 1852-1479
  • 0325-2221
Cited by
2
References
0

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review