The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Authorship and AI tools
Open accessOverview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Revised Surgical CAse REport (SCARE) Guideline: An Update for the Age of Artificial Intelligence
Kerwan, A., Al‐Jabir, A., Mathew, G., Sohrabi, C., Rashid, R., Franchi, T., Nicola, M., Agha, M., & Agha, R. (2025) · Premier journal of science. · doi:10.70389/pjs.100079 · Cited by 769
Transparency in the Reporting of Artificial Intelligence – The TITAN Guideline
Agha, R. A., Mathew, G., Rashid, R., Kerwan, A., Al-Jabir, A., Sohrabi, C., Franchi, T., Nicola, M., & Agha, M. (2025) · Premier Journal of Science · doi:10.70389/pjs.100082 · Cited by 426
Agha, R., Mathew, G., Rashid, R., Kerwan, A., Al‐Jabir, A., Sohrabi, C., Franchi, T., Nicola, M., & Agha, M. (2025) · Premier journal of science. · doi:10.70389/pjs.100081 · Cited by 118
Agha, R., Mathew, G., Rashid, R., Kerwan, A., Al‐Jabir, A., Sohrabi, C., Franchi, T., Nicola, M., & Agha, M. (2025) · Premier journal of science. · doi:10.70389/pjs.100080 · Cited by 72
Suchikova, Y., Tsybuliak, N., Teixeira da Silva, J. A., & Nazarovets, S. (2026) · Accountability in Research · doi:10.1080/08989621.2025.2544331 · Cited by 70
Metadata
- Publisher
- Committee on Publication Ethics
- Published
- 2024-08-20
- OpenAlex
- W4405501506
- Cited by
- 210
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 151 · 2025: 55 · 2024: 3
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Academic integrity and plagiarism
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Authorship Attribution and Profiling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
- Keywords
- authorship, AI tools, authorship attribution, AI-generated text
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-13 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Authorship and AI tools. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.24318/ccvrzbms
- The paper
- Authorship and AI tools. (2024). https://doi.org/10.24318/ccvrzbms
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
