The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Diseño del formato de escalas tipo Likert: un estado de la cuestión
Open accessAbstract
Las escalas tipo Likert constituyen uno de los instrumentos más utilizados en Ciencias Sociales y estudios de mercado. No obstante, existe cierto debate sobre el formato de estas escalas para obtener datos de calidad. En este artículo se presenta un estudio de revisión sobre los formatos de las escala tipo Likert y su relación con la calidad de los datos que es posible obtener con ellos. Para ello se ha realizado una revisión sistemática junto con una síntesis del contenido, identificando un conjunto de temas o tópicos relevantes por sus implicaciones metodológicas: sesgos y estilos de respuesta, el número óptimo de alternativas, las razones de elección de la alternativa intermedia y el efecto de la alternativa “No opino”. Con base en el análisis y discusión de estos temas se presentan algunas recomendaciones de formato en las conclusiones del estudio.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mail and internet surveys : the tailored design method
Dillman, D. A. (2007) · Cited by 9,587
Flesch, R. (1948) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0057532 · Cited by 5,391
Measurement and Control of Response Bias
Paulhus, D. L. (1991) · Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Attitudes · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-590241-0.50006-x · Cited by 3,598
Dawes, J. (2008) · International Journal of Market Research · doi:10.1177/147078530805000106 · Cited by 2,107
Effect of the Number of Response Categories on the Reliability and Validity of Rating Scales
Lozano, L. M., García-Cueto, E., & Muñiz, J. (2008) · Methodology · doi:10.1027/1614-2241.4.2.73 · Cited by 843
The Optimal Number of Response Alternatives for a Scale: A Review
Cox, E. P. (1980) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378001700401 · Cited by 811
Measuring customer satisfaction: Fact and artifact
Peterson, R. A., & Wilson, W. R. (1992) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/bf02723476 · Cited by 706
Response interpolation and scale sensitivity: evidence against 5-point scales
Finstad, K. (2010) · Journal of Usability Studies archive · Cited by 591
Stuck in the middle: The use and interpretation of mid-points in items on questionnaires
Nadler, J. T., Weston, R., & Voyles, E. C. (2015) · The Journal of General Psychology · doi:10.1080/00221309.2014.994590 · Cited by 396
Attitudes and non-attitudes: Continuation of a dialogue
Converse, P. E. (1963) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e685262012-124 · Cited by 255
Metadata
- Authors
- Matas, A.
- Venue
- Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa
- Published
- 2018-02-09
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 38-47
- ISSN
- 1607-4041 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2784393884
- Cited by
- 429
- References
- 26
- FWCI
- 20.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- es
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diseño del formato de escalas tipo Likert: un estado de la cuestión. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.24320/redie.2018.20.1.1347
- The paper
- Matas, A. (2018). Diseño del formato de escalas tipo Likert: un estado de la cuestión. Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa. https://doi.org/10.24320/redie.2018.20.1.1347
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
