The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Deforestation: constructing problems and solutions on Sierra Leone's Freetown Peninsula
Open accessAbstract
This article examines the issue of deforestation on Sierra Leone's Freetown Peninsula, specifically analysing the gap that exists between the rhetoric surrounding the problem of deforestation and the subsequent policies and projects that are implemented to address it. It is argued in this paper that this gap can be better understood by examining how different actors involved in policy and projects interact over the issue of deforestation. Such an examination reveals how these actors produce discourses of blame towards poorer, politically weaker groups, which ultimately results in deforestation 'solutions' that intervene into their lives. These prescriptions of blame and subsequent solutions for deforestation are negotiated through a combination of local realities, which includes the occurrence of deforestation, and global influences such as development discourses and interventions. The analysis here reflects a political ecology framework that also draws from post-structuralist insights and reveals how underlying discourses, actions and actors across a broad political, social and economic spectrum ultimately play a role in influencing the causes, perceptions and solutions relating to deforestation. Keywords: Deforestation, Political Ecology, Freetown, Discourses, Development, Sierra Leone, Africa
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The head scarp of the landslide and a large sector of development is located within an area formally designated as the Western Area Peninsula Forest (Sesay 2005), a reserve status that if heeded would have prevented this disaster or at least limited its scope (Munro 2009).”
From The cost of rapid and haphazard urbanization: lessons learned from the Freetown landslide disaster (2019) · cites this paper as Munro 2009
In the citing paper
“We again note that the 2017 Freetown landslide occurred within the Western Area Peninsula Forest reserve (Munro 2009)”
From The cost of rapid and haphazard urbanization: lessons learned from the Freetown landslide disaster (2019) · cites this paper as Munro 2009
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The cost of rapid and haphazard urbanization: lessons learned from the Freetown landslide disaster
Cui, Y., Cheng, D., Choi, C. E., Jin, W., Lei, Y., & Kargel, J. S. (2019) · Landslides · doi:10.1007/s10346-019-01167-x · Cited by 175
“status that if heeded would have prevented this disaster or at least limited its scope (Munro 2009).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Munro, P.
- Affiliations
- Universidad Modelo (MX)
- Corresponding author
- Munro, Paul
- ORCID
- Munro, Paul
- Venue
- Journal of Political Ecology
- Publisher
- University of Arizona
- Published
- 2009-12-01
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 1073-0451 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2783926311
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 0.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Political Ecology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Environmental Movements and Political Ecology
- Social Sciences › Development › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
- Keywords
- deforestation, development discourse, forest policy, political ecology, poststructuralism, poverty and environmental degradation, development interventions, Sierra Leone
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Deforestation: constructing problems and solutions on Sierra Leone's Freetown Peninsula. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2458/v16i1.21694
- The paper
- Munro, P. (2009). Deforestation: constructing problems and solutions on Sierra Leone's Freetown Peninsula. Journal of Political Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2458/v16i1.21694