Efficacy of Ivermectin Against Cutaneous Draschia and Habronema Infection (Summer Sores) in Horses
Abstract
Thirty-one horses with naturally occurring summer sores were given a single IM injection of 0.2 mg of ivermectin (22,23-dihydroavermectin B1)/kg during the summer of 1980. Larvae of Draschia and/or Habronema spp were recovered from biopsy samples taken from 21 of 25 horses (84%) on the day of anthelmintic treatment. There was a marked clinical improvement in 26 horses (84%) 7 days after ivermectin was given. The typical summer sore was replaced by healthy pink granulation tissue at 7 days and this healed after 1 to 5 weeks. Biopsy samples were taken from 21 of these horses 1 to 6 weeks after treatment, and the samples in 18 horses (86%) were negative for larvae. Five of the 31 infected horses did not respond to a single dose and appeared to have become reinfected. Biopsy samples taken from 3 of these horses were positive for larvae 2 to 4 weeks after the 1st dose, but became negative and healed 1 to 2 weeks after a 2nd dose with ivermectin. Histopathologic examination of sections from lesions before anthelmintic treatment showed granulation tissue with marked eosinophilic infiltration, multiple eosinophilic abscesses, and transverse sections of nematodes. In sections examined after anthelmintic treatment, there were marked reduction in the number of eosinophils and absence of eosinophilic abscesses or nematodes, and the granulation tissue was more mature, as indicated by the appearance of dense fibrous connective tissue.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
For Habronema lesions, a single dose of ivermectin did not provide solid evidence of efficacy.
“For Habronema lesions, a single dose of ivermectin did not provide solid evidence of efficacy (49).”
From Habronematidosis in Equids: Current Status, Advances, Future Challenges (2020) · cites this paper as [49]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cutaneous and ocular habronemiasis in horses: 63 cases (1988-2002)
Pusterla, N., Watson, J. L., Wilson, W. D., Affolter, V. K., & Spier, S. J. (2003) · Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association · doi:10.2460/javma.2003.222.978 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Habronematidosis in Equids: Current Status, Advances, Future Challenges
Barlaam, A., Traversa, D., Papini, R., & Giangaspero, A. (2020) · Frontiers in Veterinary Science · doi:10.3389/fvets.2020.00358 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
“For Habronema lesions, a single dose of ivermectin did not provide solid evidence of efficacy (49).”
BackgroundConjunctival habronemiosis in a horse in Belgium
Gasthuys, F. M. R., Van Heerden, M., & Vercruysse, J. (2004) · Veterinary Record · doi:10.1136/vr.154.24.757 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
- Authors
- Herd, R. P., & Donham, J. C.
- Affiliations
- The Ohio State University (US)
- Venue
- American Journal of Veterinary Research
- Published
- 1981-11-01
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1953-1955
- ISSN
- 0002-9645 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4407201955
- Cited by
- 40
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 4.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Veterinary Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Helminth infection and control
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Parasitic Diseases Research and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Equine › Veterinary Equine Medical Research
- Keywords
- ivermectin, Habronema, horses, anthelmintic efficacy, nematode larvae, larval recovery, eosinophilic abscess, granulation tissue, histopathology, reinfestation, single-dose therapy
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Antiparasitic Agents, Horses, Ivermectin, Lactones, Larva, Nematode Infections, Seasons, Skin Diseases, Parasitic, Spiruroidea, Spirurida Infections
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review