Cited by 0Amphibian and Reptile BiologyVeterinary Medicine and SurgeryVitamin D Research Studies

Intermittent ultraviolet B exposure increases plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 in blue-tongued skinks (Tiliqua scincoides)

Open access
Rhim, Haerin, Godke, Ashleigh, Marrero-Acosta, Keishla, Aguilar, M. Graciela, Mitchell, Mark A.·2026·American Journal of Veterinary Research

Abstract

Objective: Ultraviolet B (UVB) guidelines for husbandry and therapeutic exposure remain limited for reptiles. We aimed to determine whether intermittent UVB exposure can elevate and maintain plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D 3 (25-OHD 3 ) concentrations in blue-tongued skinks ( Tiliqua scincoides ). Methods: A prospective, randomized experimental study was conducted using 11 subadult skinks. Six skinks received 2 hours of UVB exposure every 3 days for 30 days, while 5 controls received none. Subsequently, the control skinks received 2 hours of UVB every 7 days for 28 days. Plasma 25-OHD 3 concentrations were measured at baseline and post-UVB using chemiluminescent immunoassay. Results: Both regimens significantly increased 25-OHD 3 in a dose-dependent manner. Two-hour exposures every 3 days elevated median concentrations from 17 [13.8 to 25] to 587.5 [303.3 to 750] nmol/L, while 7-day exposures increased concentrations from 23 [17.5 to 27] to 51 [42 to 222.5] nmol/L, even with a change to new bulbs. Conclusions: Intermittent 2-hour UVB at 3- or 7-day intervals significantly elevated 25-OHD 3 concentrations, demonstrating that UVB can be administered as a therapeutic dose tailored to species-specific requirements. More research is needed to determine species-specific 25-OHD 3 reference intervals. Clinical Relevance: Periodic UVB dosing may offer a sufficient alternative to continuous daily exposure for maintaining vitamin D 3 concentrations in captive blue-tongued skinks; this practical approach supports routine management while reducing the risk of prolonged artificial UVB-related concerns.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2460/ajvr.25.11.0417

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 24

Authors
Rhim, H., Godke, A., Marrero-Acosta, K., Aguilar, M. G., & Mitchell, M. A.
Affiliations
  • Chonnam National University (KR)
  • Louisiana State University (US)
Venue
American Journal of Veterinary Research
Published
2026-08-01
Volume
87
Issue
8
ISSN
  • 0002-9645 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-5681
OpenAlex
W7160837267
Cited by
0
References
24
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Veterinary Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Louisiana State University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Amphibian and Reptile Biology
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Veterinary Medicine and Surgery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Vitamin D Research Studies
Keywords
UVB exposure, 25-hydroxyvitamin D3, vitamin D3, Tiliqua scincoides, captive reptiles, reptile husbandry, dose-response relationship
MeSH terms
Animals, Calcifediol, Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation, Female, Lizards, Male, Prospective Studies, Ultraviolet Rays

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review