Cited by 7Animal Behavior and Welfare StudiesAnimal Virus Infections StudiesAnimal health and immunology

Use of three-dimensional accelerometers to evaluate behavioral changes in cattle experimentally infected with bovine viral diarrhea virus

Bayne, Jenna E., Walz, Paul H., Passler, Thomas, White, Brad J., Theurer, Miles E., van Santen, Edzard·2016·American Journal of Veterinary Research

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To assess the use of 3-D accelerometers to evaluate behavioral changes in cattle experimentally infected with a low-virulent strain of bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV). ANIMALS 20 beef steers (mean weight, 238 kg). PROCEDURES Calves were allocated to a BVDV (n = 10) or control (10) group. On day 0, calves in the BVDV group were inoculated with a low-virulent strain of BVDV (4 × 10(6) TCID50, intranasally), and calves in the control group were sham inoculated with BVDV-free medium (4 mL; intranasally). An accelerometer was affixed to the right hind limb of each calf on day -7 to record activity (lying, walking, and standing) continuously until 35 days after inoculation. Baseline was defined as days -7 to -1. Blood samples were collected at predetermined times for CBC, serum biochemical analysis, virus isolation, and determination of anti-BVDV antibody titers. RESULTS All calves in the BVDV group developed viremia and anti-BVDV antibodies but developed only subclinical or mild disease. Calves in the control group did not develop viremia or anti-BVDV antibodies. Mean time allocated to each activity did not differ significantly between the BVDV and control groups on any day except day 8, when calves in the BVDV group spent less time standing than the calves in the control group. Following inoculation, calves in both groups tended to spend more time lying and less time walking and standing than they did during baseline. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE Results indica…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2460/ajvr.77.6.589

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bayne, J. E., Walz, P. H., Passler, T., White, B. J., Theurer, M. E., & van Santen, E.
Venue
American Journal of Veterinary Research
Published
2016-06
Volume
77
Issue
6
Pages
589-596
ISSN
0002-9645 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2399792519
Cited by
7
References
5
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Veterinary Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Virus Infections Studies
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal health and immunology
Keywords
bovine viral diarrhea virus, cattle, animal behavior, 3D accelerometer, locomotor activity, lying behavior, asymptomatic infection, viremia, antibody response, beef steers, experimental infection
MeSH terms
Animals, Antibodies, Viral, Behavior, Animal, Diarrhea Viruses, Bovine Viral, Bovine Virus Diarrhea-Mucosal Disease, Cattle, Diarrhea, Male, Monitoring, Physiologic, Motor Activity, Viremia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review