The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Herd management and prevalence of mastitis in dairy herds with high and low somatic cell counts
Abstract
Summary: Thirty-two dairy herds, 16 with low somatic cell counts (lscc; Dairy Herd Improvement Association 12-month mean herd scc ≤150,000 cells/ml) and 16 with high somatic cell counts (hscc; Dairy Herd Improvement Association 12-month mean herd scc ≥700,000 cells/ml) were evaluated to determine the relationship between the prevalence of mastitis in each herd and each herd's mastitis control and management practices. Once for each herd, duplicate quarter milk samples were collected from the lactating cows, a survey of herd mastitis control, milking hygiene, and management practices of each herd was performed, and milking machine function was evaluated. Of the 16 herds with lscc, 2 (12.5%) had Streptococcus agalactiae isolated and 7 (44 %) had Staphylococcus aureus isolated. Both organisms were found in all of the herds with hscc. In herds with lscc, the mean percentage of quarters infected with Str agalactiae was 0.1%, the mean percentage infected with streptococci other than Str agalactiae was 1.9 %, and the mean infected with S aureus was 0.7%. In herds with hscc, 25.7% of the quarters were infected with Str agalactiae, 3.7% were infected with streptococci other than Str agalactiae, and 7.6% were infected with S aureus. A program of postmilking teat dipping and treatment of all cows at the beginning of the nonlactating period was practiced more frequently in the herds with lscc (81.3%) than in the herds with hscc (37.5%). Major differences were not found between the 2 groups of herds in the use of the more common milking hygiene techniques or in the maintenance and functional characteristics of the milking equipment.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The high frequency of clinical cases and relatively short duration of Gram-negative bacterial intramammary infections render individual cow SCC and bulk tank SCC poor indicators of the prevalence of disease caused by these bacteria.
“The high frequency of clinical cases and relatively short duration of Gram-negative bacterial intramammary infections render the use of individual cow SCC and bulk tank SCC as poor indicators of the prevalence of disease caused by these bacteria [13, 20, 25, 57].”
From Coliform mastitis (2003) · cites this paper as [13]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hogan, J., & Larry Smith, K. (2003) · Veterinary Research · doi:10.1051/vetres:2003022 · Cited by 245
Metadata
- Authors
- Erskine, R. J., Eberhart, R. J., Hutchinson, L. J., & Spencer, S. B.
- Affiliations
- Pennsylvania State University (US)
- ORCID
- Erskine, R. J.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association
- Published
- 1987-06-01
- Volume
- 190
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1411-1416
- ISSN
- 0003-1488 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2463064064
- Cited by
- 80
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 3.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Milk Quality and Mastitis in Dairy Cows
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Microbial infections and disease research
- Keywords
- bovine mastitis, somatic cell count, dairy herd management, Streptococcus agalactiae, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus, milking hygiene, milking equipment, lactating dairy cows
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Cattle, Cell Count, Dairying, Female, Mastitis, Bovine, Milk, Staphylococcal Infections, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcal Infections, Streptococcus agalactiae
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review