The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Pet overpopulation: A challenge for companion animal veterinarians in the 1990s
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Companion animal overpopulation causes significant costs to humans and governments every year (Olson et al., 1991; Olson & Johnston, 1993).”
From Neutering of cats and dogs in Ireland; pet owner self-reported perceptions of enabling and disabling factors in the decision to neuter (2015) · cites this paper as Olson et al., 1991
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- [1]1. Ott RS. Veterinary services for animal use in the United Stas c o o asoc 1990;197:1134-1139.
- [2]2. Carter CN. Pet population control: another decade without solutions? J Am Vet Med Assoc 1990;197:192-195. This special section on pet overpopulation has been coordinated by Dr. Patricia N. Olson, who, as Guest Editor, was responsible for solicitation and review of all articles that follow.—Ed.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Surrendering Pets To Shelters: The Relinquisher’s Perspective
DiGiacomo, N., Arluke, A., & Patronek, G. (1998) · Anthrozoös · doi:10.1080/08927936.1998.11425086 · Cited by 157
Downes, M. J., Devitt, C., Downes, M. T., & More, S. J. (2015) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.1196 · Cited by 46
Metadata
- Authors
- Olson, P. N., Moulton, C., Nett, T. M., & Salman, M. D.
- Affiliations
- University of Minnesota (US)
- From the Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, St Paul, MN 55108 (Olson), The American Humane Association, 63 Inverness Dr East, Englewood, CO 80112 (Moulton), and the Departments of Physiology (Nett) and Environmental Health (Salman), College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523.
- ORCID
- Nett, Terry M
- Venue
- Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association
- Published
- 1991-04-01
- Volume
- 198
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1151-1152
- ISSN
- 0003-1488 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1526587773
- Cited by
- 41
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 23.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Law › Animal Law and Welfare
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Veterinary Medicine and Surgery
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Veterinary Practice and Education Studies
- Keywords
- pet overpopulation, euthanasia, animal population control, veterinary practice
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Animals, Domestic, Population Control, Population Density, Veterinary Medicine
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
