Cited by 65Parasitic Diseases Research and TreatmentHelminth infection and controlResearch on Leishmaniasis Studies

Performance of serologic tests used to detect heartworm infection in cats

Open access
Snyder, Patti S., Levy, Julie K., Salute, Marc E., Gorman, Shawn P., Kubilis, Paul S., Smail, Paul W., George, Linda L.·2000·Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association

Abstract

Objective—To compare heartworm serum antibody (Ab) and antigen (Ag) test results, using commercial laboratories and in-house heartworm test kits, with necropsy findings in a population of shelter cats. Design—Prospective study. Animals—330 cats at an animal shelter. Procedure—Between March and June 1998, 30 ml of blood was collected from the cranial and caudal venae cavae of 330 cats that were euthanatized at a local animal shelter. Results of heartworm Ab and Ag serologic tests for heartworm infection were compared with necropsy findings in this population of cats, using commercial laboratories and in-house test kits to measure serum Ab and Ag concentrations. Results—On necropsy, adult Dirofilaria immitis were found in 19 of 330 (5.8%) cats. Combining results from serum Ab and Ag tests achieved higher sensitivities than using serum Ab and Ag test results alone (ie, maximum sensitivities of 100% vs 89.5%, respectively), whereas use of serum Ag and Ab test results alone achieved higher specificities compared with the use of a combination of serum Ab and Ag results (ie, maximum specificities of 99.4% vs 92.9%, respectively). Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—On the basis of our findings, if a cat has clinical signs that suggest heartworm disease despite a negative heartworm serum Ab test result, an alternative heartworm Ab test, a heartworm Ag test, thoracic radiography, or two-dimensional echocardiography should be performed. (J Am Vet Med Assoc 2000;216:693–700)

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2460/javma.2000.216.693

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 20 · Cited by 65

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Dillon R, Atkins C, Clekis T, et al. Feline heartworm dis- ease, Part 2. Feline Pract 1997;25:1, 26-30.
  2. Ralston SL, Stemme K, Guerrero J. Preventing feline heart- worm disease. Feline Pract 1998;26:18-22.
  3. Dillon R. Feline heartworms: more then just a curiosity. Vet Forum 1995;12:18-26.
  4. Sisson D. A definitive approach to heartworm disease in cats. Vet Forum 1998;15:40-48.
  5. Ryan WG, Gross SJ, Soll MD. Diagnosis of feline heartworm disease, in Proceedings. 8th Heartworm Symp 1995;121-126.
  6. Atkins CE, Atwell RB, Dillon R, et al. American Heartworm Society guidelines. Guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment, and pre- vention of heartworm (Dirofilaria immitis) infection in cats. Compend Contin Educ Pract Vet 1997;19:422-429.
  7. Dillon R, Atkins C, Clekis T, et al. Feline heartworm dis- ease. Part 3. Feline Pract 1997;25:12-21.
  8. Zanotti S, Kaplan P. Feline dirofilariasis. Compend Contin Educ Pract Vet 1989;11:1005-1008, 1010, 1012, 1014.
  9. Dzimianski MT, McCall JW, McCall CA, et al. Evaluation of heartworm immunodiagnostic test kits using well defined cat sera, in Proceedings. 5th Heartworm Symp 1986;159-161.
  10. Fowler JL, Matsuda K, Fernau RC. Experimental infection of the domestic cat with Dirofilaria immitis. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1972;8:79-80.

Authors
Snyder, P. S., Levy, J. K., Salute, M. E., Gorman, S. P., Kubilis, P. S., Smail, P. W., & George, L. L.
Affiliations
University of Florida (US)
Venue
Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association
Published
2000-03-01
Volume
216
Issue
5
Pages
693-700
ISSN
0003-1488 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2104025137
Cited by
65
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2
FWCI
2.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Parasitic Diseases Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Helminth infection and control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Research on Leishmaniasis Studies
Keywords
feline heartworm disease, Dirofilaria immitis, serological diagnosis, sensitivity and specificity, shelter cats, autopsy findings
MeSH terms
Animals, Antibodies, Helminth, Antigens, Helminth, Cat Diseases, Cats, Dirofilaria immitis, Dirofilariasis, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, False Negative Reactions, False Positive Reactions, Female, Hemolysis, Lipids, Male, Prospective Studies, Reagent Kits, Diagnostic, Sensitivity and Specificity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review