Cited by 159Milk Quality and Mastitis in Dairy CowsAnimal health and immunologyMicrobial infections and disease research

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Bacteremia associated with naturally occurring acute coliform mastitis in dairy cows

Open access

Abstract

Objective—To determine the incidence of bacteremia in dairy cows with naturally occurring acute coliform mastitis (ACM) with a wide range of disease severity. Design—Cohort study. Animals—144 dairy cows with ACM from 6 herds. Procedure—Cows were examined at time of identification of ACM (time 0) and classified as having mild, moderate, or severe mastitis on the basis of rectal temperature, hydration status, rumen contraction rate, and attitude. Cows were reexamined at 24 or 48 hours. Bacteriologic culturing of milk and blood (30 ml), CBC, and serum biochemical analysis were performed at each time point. Appropriate samples were obtained at a single point from herdmates without mastitis (controls) that were closely matched for lactation number and days since parturition. Blood culture results were compared among severity groups and controls by use of χ 2 tests, as was outcome of an ACM episode for cows grouped by blood bacterial isolates. Results—Bacteria were isolated from 52 blood samples from 46 of 144 (32%) cows with ACM, which was significantly more than control cows (11/156; 7.1%). Group-1 isolates (Escherichia coli, Pasteurella multocida, Mannheimia haemolytica, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Enterobacter agglomerans, and Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium) were identified in 20 of 144 (14%) cows with ACM and 0 of 156 control cows. Group-1 isolates were identified in 4.3, 9.1, and 42% of cows classified as having mild, moderate, and severe ACM, respectively. Escherichia coli and K pneumoniae milk and blood isolates obtained from the same cow were of the same genotype. Bacillus spp were identified in 21 of 144 (15%) cows with ACM, which was significantly more than control cows (3/156; 1.9%). Thirty-five percent of cows with a group-1 isolate died during the mastitis episode. Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Results suggest that bacteremia develops in a substantial proportion of cows with ACM. Classification of severity of disease is important for establishment of effective treatment protocols; parenteral antimicrobial treatment may be indicated in cows with ACM. (J Am Vet Med Assoc 2001;219:976–981)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2460/javma.2001.219.976

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Coliform mastitis can result in bacteremia and septicemia as the blood-milk barrier is destroyed.

    “Coliform mastitis can result in bacteremia and septicemia as the blood-milk barrier is destroyed [61].”

    From Coliform mastitis (2003) · cites this paper as [61]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) reports that E. coli and Klebsiella isolated from cows’ blood matched isolates from their infected mammary glands, supporting mastitis-associated bacteremia. It does not establish septicemia or show that destruction of the blood–milk barrier caused the bacteremia; it also notes that some cases may involve bacteria translocating from other organs. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. Erskine R, 1988, J Am Vet Med Assoc, 192, 761
  2. Gonzalez RN, 1990, J Dairy Sci, 73, 648, 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(90)78716-4 · DOI
  3. Fox L, 1993, Coliform Mastitis Symp, 7
  4. Frost AJ, 1982, Res Vet Sci, 33, 105, 10.1016/S0034-5288(18)32368-3 · DOI
  5. Pyorala S, 1994, J Dairy Sci, 77, 453, 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(94)76973-3 · DOI
  6. Shpigel NY, 1998, Cattle Pract, 6, 113
  7. Powers M, 1986, J Am Vet Med Assoc, 189, 440
  8. Cebra CK, 1996, J Vet Intern Med, 10, 252, 10.1111/j.1939-1676.1996.tb02058.x · DOI
  9. 10.2460/javma.2001.218.567 · DOI
  10. National Mastitis Council, 1999, Wis: National Mastitis Council Inc, 31
  11. 10.1016/0378-1135(94)00070-D · DOI
  12. Dow S, 1989, Compend Contin Educ Pract Vet, 11, 432
  13. Nostrandt AC, 1990, Probl Vet Med, 2, 348
  14. Mathews WC, 1998, Am J Epidemiol, 148, 1175, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009606 · DOI
  15. Frost AJ, 1980, Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci, 209, 431, 10.1098/rspb.1980.0104 · DOI
  16. Jones TO, 1990, Vet Bull, 60, 205
  17. 10.1146/annurev.mi.36.100182.002343 · DOI
  18. Washington J., 1975, Mayo Clin Proc, 50, 91
  19. Hall MM, 1976, J Clin Microbiol, 3, 643, 10.1128/jcm.3.6.643-645.1976 · DOI
  20. Tenney J, 1982, J Clin Microbiol, 15, 558, 10.1128/JCM.15.4.558-561.1982 · DOI
  21. Meyrick B, 1986, Fed Proc, 45, 19
  22. Lohuis J, 1988, J Dairy Sci, 71, 2782, 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(88)79872-0 · DOI
  23. Katholm J, 1992, Vet Rec, 131, 513, 10.1136/vr.131.22.513 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Wenz, J. R., Barrington, G. M., Garry, F. B., McSweeney, K. D., Dinsmore, R. P., Goodell, G., & Callan, R. J.
Affiliations
  • Colorado State University (US)
  • American Association of Bovine Practitioners (US)
Venue
Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association
Published
2001-10-01
Volume
219
Issue
7
Pages
976-981
ISSN
0003-1488 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2098947142
Cited by
159
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 5
FWCI
11.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Milk Quality and Mastitis in Dairy Cows
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal health and immunology
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Microbial infections and disease research
Keywords
bacteremia, dairy cattle, mastitis severity, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pasteurella multocida, Mannheimia haemolytica, Salmonella typhimurium, Bacillus, blood culture, milk culture, mortality
MeSH terms
Acute Disease, Animals, Cattle, Enterobacteriaceae, Enterobacteriaceae Infections, Female, Genotype, Mastitis, Bovine, Milk, Severity of Illness Index, Colony Count, Microbial, Cohort Studies, Bacteremia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review