Cited by 69Vector-borne infectious diseasesViral Infections and VectorsZoonotic diseases and public health

Implications of presumptive fatal Rocky Mountain spotted fever in two dogs and their owner

Open access
Elchos, Brigid N., Goddard, Jerome·2003·Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association

Abstract

A dog was examined because of petechiation, an inability to stand, pale mucous membranes, a possible seizure, and thrombocytopenia. Tick-borne illness was suspected, but despite treatment, the dog died. Eight days later, a second dog owned by the same individual also died. The dog was not examined by a veterinarian, but Rocky Mountain spotted fever (RMSF) was suspected on the basis of clinical signs. Two weeks after the second dog died, the owner was examined because of severe headache, fever, nausea, vomiting, decreased appetite, lethargy, and a fine rash on the body, face, and trunk. Despite intensive treatment for possible RMSF, the owner died. Although results of an assay for antibodies to Rickettsia rickettsii were negative, results of polymerase chain reaction assays of liver, spleen, and kidney samples collected at autopsy were positive for spotted fever group Rickettsia spp. These cases illustrate how dogs may serve as sentinels for RMSF in humans and point out the need for better communication between physicians and veterinarians when cases of potentially zoonotic diseases are seen.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2460/javma.2003.223.1450

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The presence of concurrent sick pets may prove useful in diagnosing certain illness.

    “the presence of concurrent sick pets may prove useful in diagnosing certain illness, as was previously highlighted by a case of Rocky Mountain spotted fever in a patient and her two dogs. 38”

    From Reducing the risk of pet-associated zoonotic infections (2015) · cites this paper as [38]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Elchos, B. N., & Goddard, J.
Affiliations
Mississippi State Department of Health (US)
Venue
Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association
Published
2003-11-15
Volume
223
Issue
10
Pages
1450-1452
ISSN
0003-1488 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2055136147
Cited by
69
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
FWCI
1.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Vector-borne infectious diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Viral Infections and Vectors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Zoonotic diseases and public health
Keywords
Rocky Mountain spotted fever, Rickettsia rickettsii, spotted fever group rickettsiae, dogs as sentinels, zoonoses, tick-borne diseases, thrombocytopenia, polymerase chain reaction detection
MeSH terms
Animals, Antibodies, Bacterial, Arachnid Vectors, Brain Edema, Dog Diseases, Dogs, Female, Humans, Male, Rickettsia, Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever, Seasons, Ticks, Zoonoses, Fatal Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review