Steering the ark toward Eden: Design for animal well-being
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Simply providing a large green space does not ensure an adequate degree of complexity to keep residents occupied.
“Simply providing a large green space does not ensure an adequate degree of complexity to keep residents occupied [4].”
From The Benefits of Increased Space and Habitat Complexity for the Welfare of Zoo-Housed King Penguins (Aptenodytes patagonicus) (2023) · cites this paper as [4]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Fuller, G., Jones, M., Gartland, K. N., Zalewski, S., Heintz, M. R., & Allard, S. (2023) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani13142312 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
“Simply providing a large green space does not ensure an adequate degree of complexity to keep residents occupied [4].”
Background
- Authors
- Coe, J. C.
- Corresponding author
- Coe, Jon Charles
- ORCID
- Coe, Jon Charles
- Venue
- Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association
- Published
- 2003-10-01
- Volume
- 223
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 977-980
- ISSN
- 0003-1488 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2161136716
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 0.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Veterinary Practice and Education Studies
- Social Sciences › Law › Animal Law and Welfare
- Keywords
- animal welfare
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Animal Husbandry, Animal Welfare, Animals, Zoo, Female, Housing, Animal, Male, Physical Conditioning, Animal, Reproduction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
