Cited by 79Veterinary Medicine and SurgeryAnimal Behavior and Welfare StudiesAnimal Law and Welfare

Population characteristics and neuter status of cats living in households in the United States

Open access
Chu, Karyen, Anderson, Wendy M., Rieser, Micha Y.·2009·Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association

Abstract

Objective—To gather data on cats living in US households, document their neuter status, and identify demographic characteristics associated with neuter status. Design—Cross-sectional, random-digit-dial telephone survey. Sample Population—1,205 adults in the continental United States contacted between April 24, 2007, and May 14, 2007. Procedures—Information was gathered by means of computer-assisted telephone interviews. Multivariate logit analysis was used to identify demographic characteristics significantly associated with neuter status. Results—383 of 1,205 (31.8%) respondents reported having at least 1 cat at the time of the survey, yielding an estimated population of 82.4 million cats living in 36.8 million US households. Overall, 680 of 850 (80.0%) cats were reportedly neutered. Of the 371 neutered female cats, 303 (81.7%) had reportedly been neutered before having any litters. Proportion of cats that were neutered differed significantly across annual family income groups, with 96.2% (231/240) of cats in households with annual family incomes ≥ $75,000 being neutered, 90.7% (231/254) of cats in households with annual family incomes between $35,000 and $74,999 being neutered, and only 51.4% (123/239) of cats in households with annual family incomes < $35,000 being neutered. Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Findings suggested that a high percentage (80.0%) of cats living in households in the United States were neutered and that annual family income was the strongest predictor of whether cats in the household were neutered. The present study did not attempt to address stray and feral cats, which represent a substantial but unknown percentage of the total US cat population.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2460/javma.234.8.1023

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chu, K., Anderson, W. M., & Rieser, M. Y.
Venue
Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association
Published
2009-04-15
Volume
234
Issue
8
Pages
1023-1030
ISSN
0003-1488 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2076969236
Cited by
79
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
6.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Veterinary Medicine and Surgery
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Social Sciences › Law › Animal Law and Welfare
Keywords
cats, ovariohysterectomy, neuter status, household income, demographic predictors
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Animals, Castration, Cats, Cross-Sectional Studies, Data Collection, Family Characteristics, Female, Humans, Income, Male, Middle Aged, Ownership, Telephone, United States, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review