Cited by 96Veterinary Medicine and SurgeryAnimal Nutrition and PhysiologyAquaculture Nutrition and Growth

Evaluation of recipes of home-prepared maintenance diets for dogs

Stockman, Jonathan, Fascetti, Andrea J., Kass, Philip H., Larsen, Jennifer A.·2013·Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association

Abstract

JAVMA, Vol 242, No. 11, June 1, 2013 D the availability of complete and balanced commercial canine maintenance diets, many owners choose to prepare their pet’s diet at home for reasons such as having more control of the foods that their pet eats, distrust in pet food companies, and the desire to feed a more natural diet. Recipes published by veterinarians and lay writers are readily accessible to pet owners in the popular media (Internet, pet magazines, and books). However, current recommendations are that home-prepared diets are best evaluated and formulated by a veterinary nutritionist. In general, many homeprepared diets are more costly, more time-consuming, and less convenient than are commercial diets, and many home-prepared diets have major nutritional imbalances. Another concern is lack of clear instructions in many recipes, which necessitates assumptions or judgments by pet owners. The nutritional adequacy of recipes for 67 home-prepared diets for dogs and cats with chronic kidney disease has been evaluated, and assumptions were needed for the preparation of every recipe. Lack of clear instructions likely increases variability and potentially impacts the nutritional profile of the prepared diet. Combined with problems of nutritional adequacy, this may result in substantial harm to pets when homeprepared diets are used on a long-term basis. The information reported here is intended to provide an evaluation of recipes for home-prepared diets for adult dogs conducted via…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2460/javma.242.11.1500

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Multiple veterinary studies of recipes found in books and on websites have shown that the majority of these recipes, even those written by veterinarians, do not provide complete and balanced nutrition.

    “Multiple veterinary studies of recipes found in books and on websites have shown that the majority of these recipes, even those written by veterinarians, do not provide complete and balanced nutrition.95–97”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stockman, J., Fascetti, A. J., Kass, P. H., & Larsen, J. A.
Affiliations
Veterinary Medical Teaching Hospital (US)
Venue
Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association
Published
2013-06-01
Volume
242
Issue
11
Pages
1500-1505
ISSN
0003-1488 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2120949182
Cited by
96
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2
FWCI
7.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Veterinary Medicine and Surgery
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth
Keywords
canine nutrition, nutritional adequacy, chronic kidney disease, dietary assessment, nutritional deficiency, commercial pet food
MeSH terms
Animals, Animal Feed, Diet, Dogs, Food Analysis, Nutritive Value

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review