Cited by 63Veterinary Medicine and SurgeryAnimal Nutrition and PhysiologyAquaculture Nutrition and Growth

Assessment of protein and amino acid concentrations and labeling adequacy of commercial vegetarian diets formulated for dogs and cats

Kanakubo, Kayo, Fascetti, Andrea J., Larsen, Jennifer A.·2015·Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association

Abstract

Objective—To determine measured crude protein (CP) and amino acid (AA) concentrations and assess labeling adequacy of vegetarian diets formulated for dogs and cats. Design—Cross-sectional study. Sample—13 dry and 11 canned vegetarian diets for dogs and cats. Procedures—Concentrations of CP and AAs were determined for each diet. Values were compared with the Association of American Feed Control Officials (AAFCO) Dog and Cat Food Nutrient Profiles. Product labels were assessed for compliance with AAFCO regulations. Results—CP concentration (dry-matter basis) ranged from 19.2% to 40.3% (median, 29.8%). Minimum CP concentrations for the specified species and life stage were met by 23 diets; the remaining diet passed appropriate AAFCO feeding trials. Six diets did not meet all AA minimums, compared with the AAFCO nutrient profiles. Of these 6 diets, 1 was below AAFCO minimum requirements in 4 AAs (leucine, methionine, methionine-cystine, and taurine), 2 were below in 3 AAs (methionine, methionine-cystine, and taurine), 2 were below in 2 AAs (lysine and tryptophan), and 1 was below in 1 AA (tryptophan). Only 3 and 8 diets (with and without a statement of calorie content as a requirement, respectively) were compliant with all pet food label regulations established by the AAFCO. Conclusion and Clinical Relevance—Most diets assessed in this study were not compliant with AAFCO labeling regulations, and there were concerns regarding adequacy of AA content. Manufacturers should ensure regulatory compliance and nutritional adequacy of all diets, and pets fed commercially available vegetarian diets should be monitored and assessed routinely.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2460/javma.247.4.385

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kanakubo, K., Fascetti, A. J., & Larsen, J. A.
Affiliations
University of California, Davis (US)
Venue
Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association
Published
2015-08-15
Volume
247
Issue
4
Pages
385-392
ISSN
0003-1488 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1748898571
Cited by
63
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2
FWCI
3.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Veterinary Medicine and Surgery
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth
Keywords
vegetarian diet, dogs, cats, crude protein, amino acids, nutritional adequacy, taurine, methionine, lysine, tryptophan, leucine, methionine + cystine, regulatory compliance
MeSH terms
Animals, Animal Feed, Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena, Cat Diseases, Cats, Cross-Sectional Studies, Dog Diseases, Dogs, Food Labeling, Obesity, Morbid, Diet, Protein-Restricted

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review