The crystal data and stability of calcite III at high pressures based on single-crystal X-ray experiments
Open accessAbstract
Single-crystal X-ray experiments have been performed for calcite, calcite II, and calcite III at 300 K and pressures up to 4.1 GPa. The volume decrease from calcite to calcite II is estimated to be 0.54 cm3/mol (1.5 %) at 1.5 GPa, which compares well with the value 0.48 cm3/mol in the calcite to calcite II transition at 1.4 GPa reported previously based on piston-cylinder volume-compression experiments. The crystal data of calcite III have been determined using single-crystal X-ray analyses at 300 K and pressures between 2.3 and 4.1 GPa. The calcite III crystal is found to be monoclinic with the space group either C2, Cm, or C2/m from the systematic absence of reflections, and with the refined cell parameters of a = 8.707(7), b = 9.315(6), c = 6.154(4) Å, and β = 115.18(2)° at 2.3 GPa. These crystal data of calcite III at 2.3 GPa yield a density of 2.94 g/cm3 for Z = 8, which is much less than the previously estimated densities, ranging from 3.11 to 3.28 g/cm3 at pressures from 1.9 to 2.9 GPa, using powder X-ray analyses based on orthorhombic structural models for calcite III, but is generally consistent with the reported data by the piston-cylinder experiments. Thus the present study reveals the density of calcite III is substantially less than that of aragonite (3.02 g/cm3 at 2.3 GPa), indicating that calcite III is metastable with respect to aragonite at high pressures.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Attempts to correctly index the diffraction pattern of CaCO3-III failed.
“Several models were proposed based on powder-like data (Davis, 1964;Hagiya et al., 2005), but any attempt to correctly index the diffraction pattern failed.”
From Structures and Crystal Chemistry of Carbonate at Earth's Mantle Conditions (2020) · cites this paper as Hagiya et al., 2005
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Structures and Crystal Chemistry of Carbonate at Earth's Mantle Conditions
Merlini, M., Milani, S., & Maurice, J. (2020) · Geophysical Monograph Series · doi:10.1002/9781119508229.ch9 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“Several models were proposed based on powder‐like data (Davis, 1964; Hagiya et al., 2005), but any attempt to correctly index the diffraction pattern failed.”
Method
- Authors
- HAGIYA, K., MATSUI, M., KIMURA, Y., & AKAHAMA, Y.
- Affiliations
- University of Hyogo (JP)
- Venue
- Journal of Mineralogical and Petrological Sciences
- Published
- 2005
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 31-36
- ISSN
- 1345-6296 (ISSN-L)
- 1349-3825
- OpenAlex
- W2015244929
- Cited by
- 17
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Mineralogical and Petrological Sciences (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (16540442)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › High-pressure geophysics and materials
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Calcium Carbonate Crystallization and Inhibition
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geochemistry and Petrology › Mineralogy and Gemology Studies
- Keywords
- calcite, high pressure, crystal structure, monoclinic polymorph, density, metastability, aragonite, phase transitions, space group determination
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review