Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 474

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

What and Where are the Primary Affects? Some Evidence for a Theory

Tomkins, Silvan S., McCarter, Robert·1964·Perceptual and Motor Skills

Abstract

A set of 69 facial photographs of models simulating affective neutrality and the eight primary affects of interest, enjoyment, surprise, distress, fear, shame, contempt, and anger were presented to a group of 24 firemen whose task it was to identify the affect in the photograph. The hypotheses, tested and confirmed were that (a) all Ss would identify primary affects in the photographs with above chance accuracy, (b) groups of Ss would confuse some affects with others in a systematic fashion, and (c) some Ss would show individual biases in their judgments.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2466/pms.1964.18.1.119

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 474

Metadata

Authors
Tomkins, S. S., & McCarter, R.
Venue
Perceptual and Motor Skills
Published
1964-02
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
119-158
ISSN
  • 0031-5125 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-688X
OpenAlex
W1993148431
Cited by
474
References
0
FWCI
1.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: What and Where are the Primary Affects? Some Evidence for a Theory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2466/pms.1964.18.1.119
The paper
Tomkins, S. S., & McCarter, R. (1964). What and Where are the Primary Affects? Some Evidence for a Theory. Perceptual and Motor Skills. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1964.18.1.119

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.